Search for: "US Constitution Petition" Results 8721 - 8740 of 12,694
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2012, 2:09 pm by William A. Ruskin
I have written about the use of Lone Pine Orders both on this blog and in journal articles. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:34 am by Brian D. Lerner
If you use a service animal such as a guide dog, your animal may come with you to your interview and oath ceremony. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:57 am by Susan Brenner
  As the Court of Appeals noted, first, a “constitutional claim may be forfeited by failure to raise it in the trial court” and “[such] is the case here. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:58 pm by corey
Any person adjudged a juvenile delinquent may have such adjudication expunged as follows: (1) Pursuant to N.J.S.2C:52-2, if the act committed by the juvenile would have constituted a crime if committed by an adult; (2) Pursuant to N.J.S.2C:52-3, if the act committed by the juvenile would have constituted a disorderly or petty disorderly persons offense if committed by an adult; or (3) Pursuant to N.J.S.2C:52-4, if the act committed by the juvenile would have constituted an… [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:29 pm by Franck Wobst
Indeed, it is the only thing that matters – even when the quorum is constituted electronically. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:29 pm by Franck Wobst
Indeed, it is the only thing that matters – even when the quorum is constituted electronically." [read post]
15 May 2012, 11:55 am by Steve Vladeck
As I’ve explained before, the Rigell-Landry bill is completely superfluous, since it reaffirms something that is already true, i.e., that individuals detained within the United States are entitled to challenge their military detention through petitions for writs of habeas corpus. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:24 am by Steve Hall
But the measure also provides for shifting as much as $100 million used for death penalty costs to a fund that would pay for solving murder and rape cases. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Greenspan, evidently no shrinking violet, responded by petitioning to cancel two of FB’s registered marks. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
It’s important to remember that the Framers of the US Constitution weren’t working on building a government. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:11 pm by Seth Borden
This strikes us as an extension of the Supreme Court's New Process Steel decision, 130 S. [read post]
14 May 2012, 11:58 am by Suzanne Ito
Sign our petition to President Obama and send the message…"Estamos Unidos. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:27 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The history of the US presidency throughout the past century involved the accumulation of ever-greater power within the executive branch, much of it through regulatory infrastructure justified by constitutional theories that would leave the Framers' jaws agape. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:39 am by Suzanne Ito
Learn more about your rights: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:15 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:28 am by Alfred Brophy
  From the young attorneys and statesmen who assembled one summer in Philadelphia to draft a Declaration that shook the foundations of an empire, and set in motion the great American experiment that is now our sacred charge; to those who – here in North Carolina – ratified a state constitution calling for “all useful learning” to be “duly encouraged and promoted in one or more universities. [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Who constitutes a real party in interest or privy is a highly fact-dependent question, especially on the issue of whether a party who is not a named participant in a given proceeding nonetheless constitutes a “real party in interest” or “privy” to that proceeding. [read post]