Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit"
Results 8721 - 8740
of 10,466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
Supreme Court Orders Lower Court Review of $82.6M Award in Ford Explorer Rollover
The Associated Press
The Supreme Court ordered a state appeals court Monday to review a decision giving $82.6 million to a woman who was paralyzed after her Ford Explorer rolled over. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, allowed Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross to be deposed in litigation over the legality of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:14 am
Finally today, its an argument we’ve heard many times before but now it’s coming from an Appeals Court judge. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm
On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 7:47 am
On appeal, the Eighth Circuit affirmed, relying on its recent decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
United States case, 15-537. [read post]
Copying is all that Samsung needs to do in order to work around four of Apple's five patents-in-suit
26 Apr 2014, 7:53 am
And in connection with operating system patents, a workaround often consists in simply copying over certain program code from the operating system level to the application level.Yesterday, when everyone thought Apple and Samsung were done presenting evidence at this trial, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down a ruling that contains some really good stuff for Apple in its dispute with Motorola -- and for other defendants… [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
And the credit card account at issue in Madden was presumably one of those, because the 2d Circuit opinion in Madden v Midland mentions a notice-of-change-in-terms that changed the choice-of-law state to Delaware, FIA's home state.Exemplar of Bank of America N.A. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 4:34 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
What just doesn’t compute is how that scenario translates to a four-year legal saga culminating in an appeal to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:45 am
Putting in your contract that United States law will apply, does not mean that the parties must bring their lawsuit in the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Guijon on the phone with ICE, and ICE determining that he was in the United States unlawfully. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and possibly the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
On appeal to the Supreme Court, AT&T argued that the FAA preempted the unconscionably finding, despite the savings clause, as California law discriminated against arbitration clauses in violation of the FAA. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:52 pm
Flood appealed the ruling to the Second Circuit, which affirmed the district court, holding that Federal Baseball and Toolson were binding precedent and, thus, Major League Baseball was not subject to the Sherman Act because baseball did not constitute interstate commerce. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:12 pm
When Congress created a new district judgeship for Arkansas, the state's Senators acquiesced in a plan that saw their favorite candidate, a political insider, named to the new seat while Judge Arnold was elevated to the Eighth Circuit so that a black lawyer could replace him on the district court bench.That's how you get to be a federal appeals court judge. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 8:33 pm
Arpaio . . . in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 12:55 pm
Colonial Grocers, Inc., the United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit held that “a[n] arbitration agreement containing provisions that defeat a federal statute’s remedial purpose is still not enforceable. 124 So. 3d 408 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
United States. [read post]
19 May 2020, 1:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s method of analyzing Second Amendment issues – a three-part test that asks whether a regulation bans (1) weapons that were common at the time of ratification or (2) those that have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia and (3) whether law-abiding citizens retain adequate means of self-defense – is consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding… [read post]
