Search for: "York v York"
Results 8721 - 8740
of 51,499
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2020, 4:59 am
In Tzolis v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
Canada In the case of Zoutman v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:43 pm
Citing last term’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 8:15 am
This, he claims, violates the Americans with Disabilities Act and New York law. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
Vance, the New York tax return case. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 6:45 am
On October 16, 2018, New York Governor Andrew M. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 12:00 am
On October 16, 2018, New York Governor Andrew M. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:28 pm
Batalla Vidal et al., v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:48 pm
Recently in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:39 pm
In Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:32 am
This is one of those celebrity cases that only arise in the Second Circuit, home of New York City, where famous people live and work and play and bring lawsuits against other famous people.The case is Oakley v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
Wahlquist, Sabastian V. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
In Harvest Rock Church v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Bender v New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., 38 NY2d 662, the Appellate Division explained that the Doctrine of Estoppel "is only applicable to a government agency when the agency acts or comports itself wrongfully or negligently, inducing reliance by a party who changes his or her position to his or her detriment or prejudice. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Bender v New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., 38 NY2d 662, the Appellate Division explained that the Doctrine of Estoppel "is only applicable to a government agency when the agency acts or comports itself wrongfully or negligently, inducing reliance by a party who changes his or her position to his or her detriment or prejudice. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
New York argued. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 2:01 am
In a ruling late in the night, the day before Thanksgiving, the Supreme Court issued a preliminary injunction against Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York, preventing him from imposing restrictions on how many people could attend houses of worship—restrictions that Governor Cuomo defended as necessary to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:07 pm
Preska of the Southern District of New York dismissed the securities class action against the U.S. [read post]
