Search for: "mark"
Results 8721 - 8740
of 136,219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2010, 11:50 am
Among the provisions of this proposed legislation is a modification of the false marking statute. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:33 am
Rooney's death marked the end of not only the longest and most prolific career of a movie star in Hollywood history -- one spanning the silent era through MGM's golden age to the upcoming Night at the Museum 3 -- but also a bizarre family dispute that engulfed him, his wife and her two sons from a previous marriage, Chris Aber and Mark Aber (who goes by Mark Rooney), throughout his final years. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 6:25 am
The Board reversed a refusal to register the mark shown below left, for "gin," finding that the USPTO failed to prove confusion likely with the mark on the right, for various beers. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
" In any event, none of the three third-party marks is as close to registrant's mark as is applicant's mark. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 3:02 am
To qualify for federal registration, a mark must be in "lawful" use, and so any goods or services for which the mark is used must not be illegal under federal law. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 3:58 am
The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark UNRIVALED LUXURY for, inter alia, cruise ship services, finding the mark to be primarily merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:56 am
It claims that, as a result of its promotional activities, the mark has acquired substantial goodwill. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 3:48 am
Uinta Brewing Company applied to register the mark DUO for beer, but the USPTO refused registration under Section 2(d) on the ground of likely confusion with the identical, registered mark DUO for wine. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:22 am
Daniels's opposition to registration of the mark PROGENEALOGISTS under Section 2(f), finding that the mark lacked acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:57 am
Mikhail Levitin T/A Mikhail Levitin Institute, Opposition No. 91202898 [Opposition to registration of the mark shown below for "anti-aging cream" on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with, and likelihood of dilution of, the registered mark L'OREAL and related marks, for beauty care products, including face cream and face lotion].March 25, 2015 - 11 AM: Premio Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:06 am
Petitioner does not in any way address the issue of descriptiveness of Respondent’s mark in its brief. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 4:13 am
The parties agreed their “testimony will be presented by affidavit or declaration (and, of course, any exhibits referenced by the affiants or declarants).Abandonment: Petitioner asserted that respondent was no longer using the registered mark, but rather had been using the mark shown below:In support of its contentions, petitioner submitted several pages from respondent's website from 2010 to the present, on which the different mark, not the registered… [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:46 am
[and] the marks share not only a royal connotation but a direct familial relationship. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 3:45 am
They appear prominently as the first word in each mark. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:40 am
Of course, when the services are identical, a lesser degree of similarity between the marks is necessary to support a finding of likely confusion.Opposer pointed out that the first parts of the marks, MESO and MISO, are "phonetically identical and visually very similar." [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 4:10 am
In re Pup Scouts, LLC, Serial No. 86048207 (April 2, 2015) [not precedential].The Board began by noting that the Section 2(d) analysis for a collective membership mark is somewhat different than that for a service mark because the former does not involve purchasers or users of goods and services. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 3:39 am
Petitioner Green insisted that respondent did not have a bona fide intent because it introduced "no documentary evidence to show any intention of [sic] plans for using its mark in the United States at the time of filing the OMNI BIOTIC mark. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 3:37 am
Cir. 1987) (trade association may have standing to oppose a mark's registration without having proprietary rights).The Board found that Australian had contracted away its right to use and register its unregistered mark, [Australian had also agreed that Respondent could register and use the mark]. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:12 am
The broken lines depicting the configuration of the goods indicate placement of the mark on the goods and are not part of the mark. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 10:06 am
It is not unusual for companies to register their acronyms as trade marks. [read post]
