Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 8741 - 8760
of 21,861
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2016, 6:21 am
In the portion of the bill explaining the underlying justification, the bill’s sponsor singled out FedEx by name, stating that “delivery truck drivers (e.g. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:56 am
Jill Stein, in her capacity as a presidential candidate, and Louis Novak, in his capacity as a Michigan voter, filed a timely petition with the Michigan State Board of Canvassers seeking a state-wide vote recount. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:00 am
Manago v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:00 am
Manago v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He says that if a Bill of the UK Parliament were to change the Scottish Parliament’s competence like this, then such a Bill would engage the legislative consent convention. 15.28 Wolffe QC states that he does not consider Scottish Parliament to have any veto on the decision to trigger article 50 but that its view is relevant to the question of legislative consent. 15.26 Wolffe QC’s preliminary comments are over and he is now turning to the… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:07 pm
From two Nov. 30 opinions in Wilkerson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:18 am
Davis v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:14 am
Finding the hourly rates reasonable, and the costs expended to be reasonable as well, the court deducted one-half hour from the total time billed because for that time counsel had neglected to describe the subject of the email communications that were billed. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:09 pm
Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2016dct.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:54 am
From State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:29 am
The groundskeeper was put in charge of caring for the club’s two horses, Will and Bill, after she pointed out signs of their poor health, including cracked hooves and sores on their legs that were oozing and appeared infected. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
I just posted a comment on the new Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
She faces a £190,000 bill after the failed libel action in which James successfully counter-sued. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:03 pm
This means they have to pay for your repairs, your rental car, your loss of income, your medical bills, your pain and suffering, and any future medical bills. [read post]
Italy's Constitutional Referendum: A View From Italy in Conversation With Flora and Alessandro Sapio
3 Dec 2016, 7:43 pm
This post considers the constitutional referendum in broader context of the techniques and management of democratic engagement in Western liberal states. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
David Ryan previewed the oral argument in Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 12:01 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
