Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 8741 - 8760
of 16,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2024, 12:28 pm
(See, Rominger v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
Cross-petitions White v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
He was teaching English at Howard University when the United States entered the First World War in 1917. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:14 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:10 pm
CKx, Inc. was originally filed in New York state court. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29-30 April. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:00 pm
š v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:12 am
The Council cross-appealed on the basis that there was a power to withdraw or amend s.125 notices. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:39 pm
From J.F. v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:12 am
The Council cross-appealed on the basis that there was a power to withdraw or amend s.125 notices. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 7:15 pm
Cross posted at Life Sentences. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 9:44 am
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
It has been 15 years since the last brand v brand challenge of a biologic patent in Canada. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Today marks the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am
However, the opposing party on cross examination, has wide latitude to ask about this material. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Farina 13-1227Issue: Whether a habeas court may evade the highly deferential standard of review in the habeas statute by characterizing its legal and policy differences with the state court as unreasonable factual determinations and grant the writ on the basis of ineffectiveness of appellate counsel when the state court held that the cross-examination of the mitigation witness was not fundamental error under state law. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:25 am
The primary Florida case cited was Amason v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:25 am
The primary Florida case cited was Amason v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 12:26 pm
The case involved the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, where the EPA was trying to regulate the amount of pollution states could dump on other, “downwind” states. [read post]
