Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 8741 - 8760
of 9,555
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2009, 7:15 pm
The credit can only be taken after the 35% premium has been paid. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 1:08 pm
Additional Points 1. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 9:47 am
Jude Medical, Inc. to decide the question: Does 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:08 am
Restatements: Allegations involving restatements were involved in 35% of 2008 settlements. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 12:00 pm
ARRA generally does not modify state law as far as the duration of coverage.So the coverage elected in OH should still only last for 6 months from the date of the event (e.g., if the event was 5 months ago, the EE would only get 1 month of coverage from 3/1 to 4/1). [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
While there are many reasons for these breathtaking declines, surely a proximate cause was the sky-high assets to equity ratios of many of these institutions. 20 to 1, 35 to 1, and even 50 to 1 were not unheard of in the palmy days. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 12:20 am
The Securitisation Act contains a similar provision ( § 35). [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 10:31 pm
See, e.g., Trial Tr. 345, May 1, 2007. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 8:04 am
& Loan Assn., 35 Cal. 3d 582 (1984). [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:05 pm
You pay (1-x)% of something, and we pay x% of it. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 10:23 am
"Firm .....Number of Nonpartners Cut .....% of Nonpartners Cut*1. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:53 pm
It is based in the village of Buffalo Grove, 35 miles north of Chicago. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:07 pm
As Gilbert points out, the question, as Koss posed it, is far too ambiguous: What does having sex "because" a man gives you drugs or alcohol signify? [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
Steuben County Supreme Court Justice Peter Bradstreet: (1) conditionally granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint unless plainitiff submitted to another EUO within 60 days of the court's decsion and answered "all material and relevant questions, consistent with this Decision and Order"; (2) granted defendants' motion dismissing the negligence, slander and punitive damages claims; and (3) denied plaintiff's cross motion to serve an amended complaint… [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:01 am
While the lower court had declined to order relief under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) US Patents Applying Supreme Court precedent: Carlsbad Technology v HIF Bio (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) USPTO not laying off employees (IP Watchdog) USPTO maintenance fees (Patently-O) Merchants warranty of non-infringement (Patently-O) PLI patent bar review tour (IP Watchdog) Provisional patent applications: waiting to file non-provisionals (Patently-O) 35 USC § 315(C) and its uncodified cousin – inter partes re-examination… [read post]
Economic Stimulus Package Provides COBRA Subsidy for Employees, Administrative Burdens for Employers
26 Feb 2009, 2:47 pm
For employees: If I am eligible, what does this mean? [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 1:27 pm
Employee can get 35 percent of the COBRA premium. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 11:37 am
Does the court in question have jurisdiction to hear torts, product liability or tax cases? [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:35 am
Last week the 8th had a case on RC 2913.61(C)(1), which requires that serial theft offenses be combined into one where they arise from the offender's same employment, capacity, or relationship to another. [read post]
