Search for: "English v. English" Results 8741 - 8760 of 11,204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
  In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:22 am by Gilles Cuniberti
We knew that the English and the French do not drive on the same side of the road. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:41 am by Adam Wagner
They had a five-minute conference before the trial but the lawyer spoke only limited English and the interpreter had not been present. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:24 pm by Marc DeGirolami
  The latter was the older rule in a case from the early 1980s, People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:30 pm by uwlegalscholarship
The Department of Criminal Science, University of Parma, presents 2011 Summer Advanced Seminar in Current Developments in European Law - V edition, June 20-28, 2011. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Tovey & Ors v Ministry of Justice [2011] EWHC 271 (QB) (18 February 2011) – read judgment. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:56 am
Two Norwegian municipalities had entered into swap contracts with Depfa which were subject to English law and the jurisdiction of the English courts. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
While the Supreme Court professes to follow the tiered scrutiny doctrine set out in cases such as Washington v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:15 am by INFORRM
From Emmens v Pottle (1885) onwards, the English courts allowed a means by which people not really as responsible for a defamation as the writer and commercial publisher, could avoid liability. [read post]