Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 8741 - 8760
of 18,118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 6:02 am
He didn’t care, because “they’re probably not paying for it anyway. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 3:16 am
The Justices referenced an earlier death-sentence case, In re Kemmler from 1890, which held that the first use of the electric chair was constitutional under the 14th Amendment. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:02 am
R (Bourgass & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 16-17 February 2015. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
However, if you’re a glutton for punishment or have a (somewhat unhealthy) predilection for rounding conventions (as, strangely, this Kat does), then off we go.ConvaTec Technologies and Smith & Nephew have added another court appearance to their long list of confrontations. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
À l’instar de R. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
JUSTICE GUZMAN filed a concurring opinion, in which JUSTICE LEHRMANN and JUSTICE DEVINE joined. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 3:59 am
In the final analysis, perhaps you’re just not a nice person. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:53 pm
That despite what we were taught in 4th grade civics, our is The Law of Rule at least as much as it is The Rule of Law.Which brings me to Thursday morning.That's when Chief Justice Roberts wrote for a 6 Justice majority in King v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
Roberts announces that Justice Scalia has the opinion in Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm
As the four dissenting opinions make abundantly clear, today’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:10 am
O.K., come back when you’re done, and read this nitpicking of the Court’s rationale. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
In King v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:56 am
End of story, end of case, end of the Affordable Care Act (or Scotuscare, as Justice Scalia said the law should be re-named). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Commentary on Glossip v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:41 pm
Some conservative commentators have expressed dismay over the Chief Justice’s opinion in King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 pm
Last year, in Loving v. [read post]
