Search for: "In re R. F." Results 8741 - 8760 of 10,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
With mounting outrage, rebuked employers and noncitizen workers are channeling Howard Beale from the venerable film Network, and screaming, “We’re as mad as hell, and we’re not going to take this anymore! [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
See Callen v Callen, 287 AD2d 818 ( 3rd Dept 2001); In Re Rhianna R., 256 AD2d 1184 (4th Dept 1998) (citing Matter of Cary)(Mahady) v Megrell, 219 AD2d 334 (3rd Dept 1996), Iv App Dismissed, 88 NY2d 1065 1996); Dunbar v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 7:28 pm
And, indeed, the continual re-centering on the human, even in the face of the unavoidable emergence of the plural subject, even conscious of the implications of plural subjectivity, is a temptation that is not merely hard to resist, but also hard to avoid. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:41 am
You’re hesitant, because I’ve learned that you’d converted from Islam to Christianity, and if people in Syria learn of that, you’ll be attacked. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:28 am
"The absolute worst offenders -- people who are true sociopaths -- lying is a way of life for them, so they're going to probably pass them easily. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
Family Partnership (Copyright Litigation Blog) 2nd Circuit: Architectural works: Noninfringement of copyright on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion: Peter F Gaito Architecture, LLC v Simone Development Corp. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
If you are able to overcome the grounds for denial then maybe you should consider re-applying. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 8:13 am
Even if all tariff and non-tariff-barriers were removed, the average Korean would still be much less inclined to buy a Ford F-150 pickup truck, a Chevy Suburban, or a Jeep Grand Cherokee than the average American would be inclined to buy a smaller, more fuel-efficient Korean-made vehicle such as a Hyundai Sonata. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
Comm’r of Revenue, 460 U.S. 575, 582 (1983) (holding that a tax on ink and paper “burdens rights protected by the First Amendment”). [read post]