Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 8741 - 8760 of 21,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2017, 8:12 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Defendants company (we’ll call U.I.) had a wholly-owned subsidiary (U.S.) that was operated by the same people, using the same dispatchers and operating out of the same building. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:02 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  If they keep the employee on the job, it’s likely considered negligent retention of an employee, for which the employer may be liable for any subsequent harm. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:15 pm by Lee E. Berlik
That remains true, but starting July 1, private plaintiffs will also need to consider the fact that if they can’t prove malice, or at least constructive knowledge of falsity, the possibility exists that their case will not only get dismissed, but that they will be liable to pay the defendants legal fees. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:16 am by John R. Phillips
  The trial court held that disgorgement of $34.9 million “reasonably approximates the ill-gotten gains causally connected to Defendants violations. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:10 am by Neha Mehta
§ 1391(c), which states that venue includes “any judicial district in which such defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:24 am by Joy Waltemath
” The policy applied to all employees and did not expressly differentiate on the basis of a protected trait, said the court, noting that “at bottom, this case is about competing inferences regarding defendants motivation; that type of dispute is a poor fit for the facial discrimination framework. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
Persons who direct or assist others are jointly liable and can also be sued. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the ’34 Act. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:08 pm
Promega defends the Federal Circuit’s reading of the statute, arguing that a “substan­tial portion” of the components includes a single compo­nent if that component is sufficiently important to the invention.We look first to the text of the statute. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:59 pm
But for every beast whose ravings threaten the good order of the global system arises those great defenders who wield regulatory reform, like music in William Congreve’s play, The Mourning Bride (1697), with “Charms to sooth a savage B[r]east, To soften Rocks, or bend a knotted Oak. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:30 pm by Newman, Anzalone & Newman, LLP
That court ruled in favor of the texting defendant, but only because the plaintiff failed to show that the defendant knew that the recipient of her texts was driving. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 12:20 pm by MBettman
The jury found both defendants liable and awarded Johnson over $2.8 million in compensatory damage, plus $50,000 in punitive damges against Montgomery. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:24 am by Rory Little
Justice Sonia Sotomayor jumped in first, appearing to defend damages for police shooting victims “who had nothing to do with causing the loss. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Excruciatingly Gradual Civilization of Canada’s Legal System. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 12:37 pm by Rory Little
In fact, Honeycutt concedes that even when a defendant obtains proceeds “indirectly,” or when proceeds go to “entities or people under the defendants control,” they are subject to forfeiture. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:27 am by Jon Katz
The March 7 day that Roy was issued was great for Roy, and for all criminal defendants. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:32 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Third parties can be liable for damages to a crime victim if the defendant breached some duty of care owed to plaintiff. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:08 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Plaintiff, as representative of her husband’s estate, alleges the manufacturer of that aerial lift is liable for designing and selling defective equipment that was unreasonably dangerous. [read post]