Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 8741 - 8760
of 19,492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2016, 8:20 am
While prompt resolution of your legal matter is our goal, our approach is fundamentally different. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm
B/c that affects whether consumers choose to interact w/it and the weight/credibility they give it. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 8:18 am
When you add in the numbers in Group B who hold essentially the same proportion of representation of lawyers in Ontario, it is nearly the inverse insofar as composition. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 8:08 am
Thus, the right of publicity claims were based on a work within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
Critically, however, the NSA isn’t just plucking out the communications of suspected terrorists or spies. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 4:15 am
NATURALLY INTELLIGENT GOD GIFTED AFRICANS Analogous “positive” marks that have been granted include:THINK ISLAMNEW MUSLIM COOLMORMON SAVINGSJEWISHSTARPROUD 2 B CATHOLICIn the Tam matter, the Trademark and Trial Appeal Board refused the application for THE SLANTS as it was considered to refer negatively to Asian-Americans. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:13 am
B. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 7:37 am
As a practical matter, they need to either (a) get the decision reversed, (b) rewrite the regulations, or (c) accept really bad results as par for the course. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:11 am
If you were thinking of paying your partner to be monogamous, don’t count on it being a legally enforceable contract for either party. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:27 am
After all, there’s pretty much never fee-shifting in defendants’ direction under the Lanham Act, although the statute does provide for it (or for that matter for frivolous copyright claims) But good luck on that. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:24 am
The first three claims were thus dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:01 am
Washington’s philosophy of accommodation to the status quo in racial matters. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:17 pm
Unless and until the FCC has released a decision in a matter, it’s premature to try to bring the court in. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
I don’t know how they can do that. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:31 am
The Federal Circuit didn’t really answer that question. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:55 am
(David Headley): No I don't know Q. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 10:56 am
Heirs that agreed to do something = doesn’t matter given the statutory language. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 5:33 pm
Efferent reading should be the task for matters of law. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
Two aspects: (1) “matter of concern” in normal and intended use; (2) if you can’t see it we don’t care. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm
The appearance of the drug doesn’t matter. [read post]
