Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 8741 - 8760
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2014, 5:00 am
[I]t is not this Court’s place to challenge the adequacy of the FDA’s regulatory process in a warning context, particularly in light of t [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:46 am
Apparently, we shouldn’t. [read post]
7 May 2014, 11:48 am
You can even mark up and annotate the image right on the iPad. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:00 am
Several car articles on the matter (here, here, and even The Hollywood Reporter here) left it to speculation as to why the mark was abandoned. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:10 am
Director-related disclosure that received poor marks includes succession planning and board evaluations. [read post]
6 May 2014, 3:49 pm
The bad news is the W3C itself continues to resist any implication that systems like EME, which exist to support DRM, aren't in the best interests of the Web, or, for that matter, the W3C. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:33 pm
It has seen a number of terrible incidents, most often related to the number of poorly marked and unprotected crosswalks on busy streets. [read post]
5 May 2014, 10:12 am
“There isn’t really much here. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:00 am
Maybe your firm didn’t make the Acritas list but that doesn’t mean your firm doesn’t, or can’t, have a great brand in your market. [read post]
5 May 2014, 12:06 am
Terespolsky argued that once infringement has been established, a right to damages/reasonable royalty followed as a matter of course, i.e strict liability without fault. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
The days that she stayed home were marked as absences. [read post]
2 May 2014, 10:34 am
And while you're in Hong Kong, don't forget to come and say hello. [read post]
2 May 2014, 10:17 am
When I created and marked a tag line for one of my company's brochures, which was in the process of receiving a registered trademark, I was stunned to see a competitor (law firm) using my words exactly in a different order. [read post]
2 May 2014, 9:24 am
In our last episode of the saga of Michael Mann's defamation suit against National Review, Mark Steyn, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Rand Simberg, I explained that the matter was wrapped in a dry, but crucial, procedural issue: the District of Columbia Court of Appeal was faced with whether a defendant who loses a motion under D.C.'s anti-SLAPP law may appeal immediately, or must wait until the end of the case. [read post]
2 May 2014, 7:58 am
It's a good idea to do that if you can-- it shows the prosecutor that your client is serious, and prevents them from treating the matter as routine. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:17 am
The writer apologetically declined because as he said “the management [of the other organization] doesn’t want me to write for you because it might be confusing since our publication names are so similar. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:17 am
The writer apologetically declined because as he said “the management [of the other organization] doesn’t want me to write for you because it might be confusing since our publication names are so similar. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:17 am
The writer apologetically declined because as he said “the management [of the other organization] doesn’t want me to write for you because it might be confusing since our publication names are so similar. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:00 pm
When will another fight (be it under: trade mark, passing off and domain name) over acronyms ensue in Nigeria? [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:26 pm
” He didn’t contradict his prior opinion at all. [read post]
