Search for: "Secure US, Inc." Results 8741 - 8760 of 17,639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2015, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  After a lengthy review of the procedures used in the damages phase, the court rejected the defendants argument, adding that bec [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:00 am by Tracy Coenen
Coenen, CPA, CFF, is a forensic accountant and fraud investigator with Sequence Inc. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & Ors [2015] EWHC 1300 http://t.co/0DT1Nmp9wC -> No copyright in seismic data, ResourceEye Services Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:33 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
In essence, the court gave deference to limitations the employer placed on computer access, use, and purpose. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:00 am by Greene LLP
Department of Justice announced this week that United Parcel Service Inc. [read post]
22 May 2015, 6:14 am by Jim Sedor
In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission has begun to scrutinize AbTech. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am by Maureen Johnston
Abbott 14-940 Issue: Whether the three-judge district court correctly held that the “one-person, one-vote” principle under the Equal Protection Clause allows States to use total population, and does not require States to use voter population, when apportioning state legislative districts. [read post]
20 May 2015, 9:49 am by Adam Nicolazzo
Chatterjee solicited investments in a nutrient supplement company, but used that money to pay off investors who thought they invested in the fixed rate securities. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:14 am by Terry Hart
Random House, Inc. and New Era Publications International ApS v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:42 am by Broc Romanek
My favorite dates back to 2001, as noted in this piece, when a fake “blank check” company calling itself “Toks Inc. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Securities: Standard for Class Actions in QuébecTheratechnologies inc. v. 121851 Canada inc., 2015 SCC 18 (35550) The “reasonable possibility” of success required under s. 225.4 sets out a different and higher standard than the general threshold for the authorization of a class action under art. 1003 of the C.C.P. [read post]
15 May 2015, 6:34 am by Michael Geist
Having endured a costly patent fight with NTP Inc. that cost RIM hundreds of millions of dollars, Balsillie unsurprisingly saves the bulk of his recommendations for patent reform. [read post]