Search for: "State v. Roberts" Results 8741 - 8760 of 16,784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2010, 8:56 am by Meg Martin
Mark Stewart of Davis & Cannon, LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Facts/Discussion: The Geringers filed petitions with the Wyoming State Board of Control (Board) for the involuntary abandonment of water rights held by Mark and Sharon Runyan and Robert and Jana Wilson (Appellees) on lands that were formerly in common ownership with the lands on which the Geringers hold water rights. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:19 pm by Colin O'Keefe
 We have a wealth of varying viewpoints on AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 1:34 pm
In an essay forthcoming in a symposium issue of the Syracuse Law Review, I argue that taken at face value, DC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
While the states were seen as “laboratories of democracy” by Justice Brandeis in New State Ice Company v Liebmann – in recent years states have become “laboratories of national partisan politics,” to adopt Jessica Bulman-Pozen’s gloss on Brandeis. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
No serious originalist – of whatever variety – can be satisfied with Chief Justice Roberts’ treatment of the key constitutional issues. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Richard Primus
  Schwartz’s fellow travelers in that literature include John Mikhail, Robert Reinstein, and, well, me. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:38 pm
Regardless of what Stevens was asked during his confirmation hearings, Roe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:34 am by Russ Bensing
  And yesterday in KRE v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
An Acoba spokesperson explained “the Ministerial Code states that ministers must ensure that no new appointments are announced, or taken up, before the committee has been able to provide its advice. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The evolution of New York’s whistle blower laws protecting public officers and employees Castro v City of New York, 2016 NY Slip Op 05615, Appellate Division, First DepartmentIn his notice of claim dated November 17, 2012, Robert J. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
Finally, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases, Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:40 pm by Rick Hasen
   Perhaps most relevant is this in-chambers opinion of Chief Justice Roberts in Lux v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:21 am
  The specifics of the antitrust evidence aside, it is now clear, at least in the federal courts, that plaintiffs no longer credibly can cite Eisen v. [read post]