Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 8741 - 8760 of 11,377
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2010, 2:42 pm by Robin Mashal
Mashal has been admitted to the State Bar of California and the Bar of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:00 am by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
  Significant growth in wage & hour litigation also was centered at the state court level, and especially in California, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Washington. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 10:04 am by Beth Graham
  Dr Strong, who is qualified as a lawyer at the New York and Illinois bars and as a solicitor of the Supreme Court of England and Wales, holds a Ph.D. in law from the University of Cambridge, a D.Phil. from the University of Oxford, a J.D. from Duke University, an M.P.W. from the University of Southern California and a B.A. from the University of California. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:11 am by Green and Associates
The Opinion stated that Jing’s statements, he said, fall short of the “high bar” that California sets on such claims, and could not have caused Dr. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” The court considered another argument: by treating purchase of a misrepresented product as injury, state legislatures have created a legal right that confers standing. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 am by Mandelman
  I understand how it happened, however, as it’s an easy mistake to make, thanks to the California State Bar’s ongoing refusal to make clear what California’s “new” law prohibits and what it allows. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:41 am by The Complex Litigator
The Court then read Wage Order 4-2001 to impose, in clear terms, the minimum wage requirements to employees of the State or any political subdivision of the State.   [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:41 am by The Complex Litigator
 The Court then read Wage Order 4-2001 to impose, in clear terms, the minimum wage requirements to employees of the State or any political subdivision of the State. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:15 am by Steven G. Pearl
California Supreme Court precedent establishes that a public employee has a contractual right to earned but unpaid compensation, which is protected by the State Constitution. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
By Ryan McCoy Following the California Supreme Court's recent decision in Martinez v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
I have linked to representative postings on each issue.(1) Ground Zero Mosque becomes national political issue while opponents of Tennessee mosque argue that Islam is not entitled to protection as a religion.(2) California federal district court invalidates Proposition 8, the California initiative that bars same-sex marriage.(3) Oklahoma voters approve anti-Shariah state constitutional amendment; court enjoins certification of… [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 8:46 am by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
The verdict underscores the strategy of the plaintiffs' bar to put their wage & hour claims in state court based on favorable state law theories. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 7:27 pm by SOIssues
A state appeals court panel nixed Espinoza's blanket order. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 6:23 am by Antitrust Today
  That case concerns whether California’s consumer protection law trumps a contract that mandates arbitration between AT&T Mobility and the consumers suing it, but bars the consumers from suing together as a class. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 8:08 pm by admin
The Woodland Hills Bankruptcy Court in the San Fernando Valley is divisional office of the United States Bankruptcy Court – Central Division of California. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 4:14 pm by Mark Murakami
  But, in this case the federal government did sue two cities in California for passing statutes which barred military recruiters from engaging in ...well, recruiting. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
The California district court initially ruled that the new class action was barred by collateral estoppel. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:18 pm
Amendment V, US Constitution; Article 1, Section 13, California Constitution. [read post]