Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 8741 - 8760 of 9,845
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2009, 2:58 pm
On June 29, 2009, the Supreme Court addressed a provocative question about the current state of workplace diversity in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:50 am
The landmark ruling had its origins in a routine Suffolk Superior Court drug prosecution taking place in 2002, and made its way all the way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:38 am
The National Law Journal The Supreme Court's unusual order Monday delaying a decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:21 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States held last week by a 5-4 majority, that a criminal defendant has the right to cross-examine forensic analysts under the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
  In state court, the traditional Pennsylvania version (based on Azzarello v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled today that white firefighters who were denied a promotion even though they scored higher on tests than minority counterparts, suffered violations of their civil rights. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:09 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
The Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1, reads in full: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 9:50 am by Kevin W Frye
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
Justice White explained how all this works with a special focus on the role of defense counsel in a concurring and dissenting opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:01 am
United States Forest Service, 535 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2008) - the Ninth Circuit determined it was not a "substantial burden" on the religious exercises of Native American tribes under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act for the Forest Service to allow a ski resort to make artificial snow from recycled sewage water on a mountain considered by the tribes to be sacred. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
This decision effectively overrules recent United States Court of Appeals jurisprudence, such as Guevara v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 12:29 am
iStock_000000215912XSmall.jpg Witness testimony that the defendant made a telephone threat to his girlfriend was inadmissible hearsay; the government could not rely on the statement alone to meet its burden to establish the foundation to show that the girlfriend was making a statement as an agent of the defendant, under FRE 801(d)(2)(D), or made an authorized party statement, under FRE 801(d)(2)(C); error in admitting the statement was harmless, in United… [read post]