Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 8741 - 8760
of 10,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2010, 1:42 pm
United States, 764 F.2d 373 (5th Cir. 1985), the plaintiff suffered an anaphylactic reaction. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:32 am
See, United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:18 am
The plaintiffs were supported by a number of amici curiae, including the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 4:46 pm
United States, 512 U.S. 452, 459 (1994) (holding that an ambiguous reference to counsel does not invoke the right to an attorney); see also United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:32 am
” for vehicles, ruling on summary judgment that Winkelmann had failed to establish the requisite bona fide intent to use his mark in the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
United States ex. rel. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:45 am
Although the conduct test was not met, the effects test was.The effects test asked whether conduct outside of the United States had a substantial adverse effect on U.S. investors or securities markets, the court noted. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Class 99) Moral rights: no grey areas – SABIP’s ‘International Perspectives on Moral Rights’ debate (IPKat) ‘Film’ includes the copyright in it for tax purposes, says Court of Appeal (IP finance) United States US General Our comments to the IP Enforcement Coordinator (Public Knowledge) Public interest groups ask targeted enforcement for intellectual property (Public Knowledge) (EFF) US Patents Forest Group decision has lead to… [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:48 am
DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKElection Law 'Motor Voter' Law Breached by Failure to Name SUNY, CUNY Offices as Registration Agencies United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 5:07 pm
Just over a month ago (in a coda to "'Hungarians' and Hungarians attack the CTM"), the IPKat mentioned a Hungarian Patent Office decision, CITY INN v C CITY HOTEL, which preferred the approach taken by the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) in ONEL v OMEL to the conventional wisdom of most of the rest of Europe and concluded that a Community trade mark is not genuinely used if it is not used in more than one country within the European… [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 12:55 pm
The Court did decide one case this week, United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
"The basic defect of the Adam Walsh Act, as applied, is that it imposes a mandatory limit on freedom of an accused without permitting an 'adversary hearing,'" Weinstein held in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:21 am
" Any person can file suit for a violation of the statute, and the proceeds are split half to the person suing and half to the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
Inc. et al.; Colorquick, LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 2:21 am
Fiat Group Automobiles S.p.A. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the search of three residences in a Kansas City methamphetamine case in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:04 pm
How in English translation Våffeldagen became to be called "International" is unclear, and in any event it's a misnomer: American contrarians have declared August 24 -- the date in 1839 when a patent for the waffle iron issued -- to be Waffle Day in the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am
The site of such arbitration shall be London, United Kingdom. [read post]
