Search for: "English v. English"
Results 8761 - 8780
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2011, 2:43 am
There is one decision in the files of Plain English Legal Publications addressing this question, at least peripherally -- Division of Military and Naval Affairs v PERB, 103 AD2d 876. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 8:01 am
In the first case, Pharmethod v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
The Irish (and indeed the English courts in the absence of a written constitution) have always shown a marked reluctance to exercise their injunction jurisdiction in a manner which would entrench on the freedom of expression enjoyed by the press and the media generally. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Kelley v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
Lord Justice Toulson in R v Chambers [2008] EWCA Crim 2467 famously bemoaned the complexity of legislation: To a worryingly large extent, statutory law is not practically accessible today, even to the courts whose constitutional duty it is to interpret and enforce it. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 1:20 pm
The jury in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:03 am
See Hall v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:59 am
See Hall v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 1:48 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
However, in J19/87, a legal opinion by an English patent barrister was sought on the point whether the transfer of the priority right in a UK first application from one English party to another English party required the signature of the assignee (it does not according to the opinion). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] UKSC 6 (9 February 2011): Supreme Court updates Pinnock (article 8 and council possession) judgment, re order and costs. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
" Pucci v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 1:03 am
Ass'n v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 11:06 am
“So you think we don’t speak English, or don’t understand English? [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:30 am
In today’s case of the day, Myrtle v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:15 am
In Jubilee Motor Policies (Lloyd's Syndicate 1231) v Volvo Truck & Bus (Southern) Ltd & Anor [2010] EWHC 3641 (QB) the High Court was asked to strike out a claim brought by the claimant insurer, Jubilee, for a contribution under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 (the Act). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:19 am
The issue has also generated a wider debate over the place of the European Court of Human Rights, which at the very least is interesting from a constitutional perspective, and as Rosalind English pointed out yesterday raises some valid questions for both supporters and detractors of the European Convention. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:23 am
In the commotion surrounding the Christian hotel gay discrimination case, it is easy to forget that there is a long-standing principle that English courts will not decide matters of religious doctrine. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm
The Early Cases Until recently the English law did not recognise any right to receive information. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:11 am
" (Of note, sales of Thomas’ English Muffins account for approximately half a billion dollars in annual sales.) [read post]
