Search for: "Good v. State"
Results 8761 - 8780
of 44,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
Smith v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 12:08 pm
I think the Cadence v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In this case, Young v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:13 am
In today's decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
[The good, the bad, and the ugly.] [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:58 am
The scope of that waiver was subject of a recent United States District Court of the Southern District of New York decision in Foster v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
For a thorough discussion of SB 94, here’s a link to my latest examination of the law that has caused more harm than good: Bull Meet Chins Shop… California’s SB 94 and the State Bar, Two Years Later. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 11:54 am
A state court bench is simply not a good substitute for a laboratory bench in application of the scientific method. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 7:09 am
Recently, in Victor Virgin Construction Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:58 am
SC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:20 am
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 11:01 am
And it did so, Kagan contended, even though no one had asked it to do so and without any good reason to do so. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:45 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:17 am
In Davis v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:15 am
Co v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:44 pm
In a huge win for consumers in New Jersey and throughout the United States, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided today in the case of Real v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:09 am
See, e.g., Bush v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 8:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the various… [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
In Jesinoski v. [read post]
