Search for: "Mark Case" Results 8761 - 8780 of 70,958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2010, 8:41 pm by Sanjana Hattotuwa
The Sahana Free and Open Source Disaster Management System in Haiti by Chamindra de Silva and Mark Prustalis appears in ICTD Case Study 2: ICT for Disaster Risk Reduction published UN-APCICT/ESCAP. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 3:11 am
Here is an updated TTABlog collection of Section 2(a) false connection cases. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:00 am
After nearly six years, I am updating the TTABlog collection of Section 2(a) false connection cases. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:21 am by R. David Donoghue
Judge Coar transferred plaintiff Heathcote's false patent marking case to the Northern District of California. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:17 am by Jani Ihalainen
While they could sell those goods without the marks on them, the Act prevents them from misleading purchasers and infringing on the marks while doing so. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:16 am by Julius Stobbs
They also failed to meet the bar for acquired distinctiveness through use and this is perhaps the most interesting part of the case, namely the discussion around acquired distinctiveness of a sub-brand when used alongside or in conjunction with a main brand. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:16 am by John L. Welch
Sustaining two oppositions and granting two petitions for cancellation, the Board found Defendant's marks GIANNI VALENTINO and GIOVANNI VALENTINO likely to cause confusion with the common law marks VALENTINO and VALENTINO GARAVANI, for clothing and handbags. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:28 am by John L. Welch
ISM, Inc., 94 USPQ2d 1111 (TTAB 2010) [precedential] (foreign owner without use of its mark in the United States may bring a claim for dilution based on the fame of its mark here, provided that it has filed an application to register the mark in this country). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 11:06 pm
The Board found that Applicant United Brands lacked a bona fide intention to use the mark for the identified goods as of the application filing date. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:54 am
The case was remanded to the TTAB to reconsider the third part of the test under the proper standard. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:33 am by Dean Freeman
  There is a chart that is marked, whether on paper or on the computer, that clearly spells out what the course of action should be in this situation. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 12:33 am
Pluses * the chance to hear two articulate exponents of trade mark law elucidating some of its finer points; * a good choice of cases about which constructive and at times thought-provoking comments could be made; * the transcript is made available too. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 11:10 am
As the evidence submitted on the appeal did not raise any new issues, the case was dismissed  given the reasonableness of the Registrar’s decision in maintaining the registration of the POM-POM mark. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:48 am by Miriam Seifter
  Both sides agreed here that the first prong was met:  a JD marks the consummation of the Corps’ decision-making process. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 12:41 pm by Michael Atkins
 I also question whether the startup did a trademark search to see whether its contemplated mark was likely to get it into this kind of scrape before it invested in the mark. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Mark Hanna, Queen’s University, Belfast                 [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:28 am
"U.S. appeals court considering teens' Web cases": Nathan Gorenstein has this article today in The Philadelphia Inquirer. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:36 am by Nedim Malovic
Cases such as the present one not only lift the interesting matter of the de minimis use in trade mark law (i.e.., when are goods supposed to be for personal use, and when should they be assumed to be used in the course of trade), but they also represent a relief for brand owners who can enjoy brief victory in a never ending game of whac-a-mole. [read post]