Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General"
Results 8761 - 8780
of 14,178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2015, 6:51 am
Attorneys, Attorney General Eric Holder stated that he has “determined that the best reading of Title VII’s prohibition of sex discrimination is that it encompasses discrimination based on gender identity, including transgender status. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:42 am
” (CNN pointed out that American leaders were “notably absent” from the rally, even though Attorney General Eric Holder was in Paris at the time.) [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:57 am
In Southern Seeding Service, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:57 am
In Southern Seeding Service, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
It seemed that the particular plight of these folks generally followed the same path. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 9:06 pm
Counsel for the Attorney General followed. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 7:52 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 6:15 am
Arguing for a small church in Arizona and its pastor challenging a sign law in the case of Reed v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in National Meat Association v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:09 pm
And although not binding as law, the California Attorney General has initiated claims against entities with vertical price restraints. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:14 am
Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine’s office will argue for Ohio. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:05 am
This post was contributed by attorney Denise E. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:03 pm
Animal-rights groups immediately asked California Attorney General Kamala Harris to appeal the ruling to the 9th U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:10 am
Did amazing work on the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee on American Indian and Alaska Native Children Exposed to Violence Report this year. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 6:54 am
See also Amos, 2014 WL 2882104, at *3.Although [plaintiff’s] attorneys assert that preemption is applicable to only generic drugs, the language in Bartlett and Amosis not so restrictive. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 1:18 pm
In an October 22, 2014, posting, we addressed the growing divide between California federal district courts and the California Supreme Court over whether an arbitration agreement can waive an employee’s right to pursue a representative claim under the state’s Private Attorney General Act (PAGA). [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:05 pm
Enough said. v [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Texas contends that the text of the Act must be read to prohibit only disparate treatment because of the Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 5:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
