Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 8761 - 8780 of 13,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am by Michael Grossman
After evaluating her claim, the district court ruled in favor of Match.com, citing Title 47, Section 230 of the United States Code, known as the Communications Decency Act (CDA). [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:23 pm by Steve Hall
“The FDA is improperly allowing drugs into the United States even though it won’t stand behind their safety and efficacy,” he said. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 5:02 am by Scott Bomboy
United States, the question is about the ability of the police to use probable cause to search a motor vehicle when its driver appears to have committed a non-moving parking infraction. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:39 am by Michael Rosman
  (On the other hand, the Court also said that, as part of its narrow-tailoring obligation, colleges and universities “can and should draw on the most promising aspects of . . . race-neutral alternatives [in states like California, Florida, and Washington where the consideration of race was prohibited by state law] as they develop. [read post]
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Petitioners’ reply Amicus brief of America’s Health Insurance Plans Amicus brief of American Hospital Association Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of Western Center for Journalism (forthcoming) Amicus brief of The California Endowment Brief of state respondents   National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Second Circuit said that “rather than looking to the identity of the parties, the type of security at issue, or whether each individual defendant engaged in conduct within the United States, we hold that a securities transaction is domestic when the parties incur irrevocable liability to carry out the transaction within the United States or when title is passed with the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:20 am
Appellant is also admitted to practice in federal court in the District of Colorado, the District of Alaska, the Southern and Western Districts of New York, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth and Tenth Circuits. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:00 am by Beth Graham
  The United States District Court for the Northern District of California ordered the parties to mediation. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-8160, apparently involving the same issue as the already granted United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:18 pm
United States invalidated Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell (DADT). [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
United States, ex rel. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:11 am by Joe Consumer
On March 4, 2009, in its 6-3 decision, Wyeth v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
” From the States and Municipalities Arizona – Voter Fraud Unit in Arizona Will [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:58 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Brinker Affirms Continued Vitality of Wage and Hour Class Actions Oil refinery workers and ConocoPhillips Co. settled meal break claims for $15 million in United Steelworkers v. [read post]