Search for: "State v. Plan" Results 8761 - 8780 of 29,613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
It's just that the lawyer for the plaintiff didn't obtain and submit them -- or even submit a concrete plan to the court for getting 'em.Two lessons, I think, can be derived from this opinion. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 10:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLP By Michele Haydel Gehrke In a decision significant for employers with Bring Your Own Device (“BYOD”) policies, a California Court of Appeal held in Cochran v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The Appellate Division, Second Department, in its March 6, 2019 decision in Schatz v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:38 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At the Fed Soc Blog, Brian Miller argues that, although Friedrichs v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 6:06 pm
Simply stated, a reasonable person would be immediately aware of the obvious risks of this conduct. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:11 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah of CMS preview the appeal to be heard by the Supreme Court on 12-13 May 2020 in the matter of Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Eight agencies are involved in the plan, which outlines both prevention and cleanup efforts. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm by Record on Appeal
Connecticut Retirement Plans & Trust Funds – securities fraud case;  Marx v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann analyzes yesterday’s argument in Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]