Search for: "State v. So"
Results 8761 - 8780
of 117,803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In Sistersong Women of Reproductive Justice Collective v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm
Textually, I argue, the Indian Commerce Clause and Indians Not Taxed Clause serve as express authorization for Congress to create legal classifications based on Indian race and ancestry, so long as those classifications are not arbitrary, as the Supreme Court stated a century ago in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:35 am
Alternatively, the Court may be implying that once the state relies on the constitutional permission to take affirmative action for some backward classes, it must do so for all of them. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 11:38 am
Interestingly, the case of North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:22 am
It is very common in first-party litigation for the policyholder to sue the in-state adjuster in addition to the out-of-state insurance company and thereby destroy diversity so the case remains in state court. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
Reversing the Fourth Circuit, the Supreme Court on Monday issued its opinion in United States Forest Service v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm
Supreme Court made this more so by reversing the Kansas Supreme Court's invalidation of a police traffic stop that relied on nothing more than that the owner of the vehicle had a revoked license, without having any pre-stop idea whether the owner was the driver.Kansas v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 5:16 am
Here's the abstract: Since the decision of the International Court of Justice in LaGrand (Germany v United States of America), the law of provisional measures has expanded dramatically both in terms of the volume of relevant decisions and the complexity of their reasoning. [read post]
9 May 2013, 11:10 am
An update on last week’s post on Performance Marketing Association, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 8:28 am
Bockes v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
In doing so, the Court held that insurers with financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims are “parties in interest” under the United States Bankruptcy Code and, therefore, may appear and be heard, including to object to Chapter 11 reorganization plans. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 11:38 am
Interestingly, the case of North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:07 pm
So there you have it.Just note that -- as is often the case -- the real fights are in the footnotes. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 7:37 am
That order in State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:40 pm
(Bell v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 4:05 am
In State of New Hampshire v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:10 am
In Bolden-Hardge v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:41 pm
In Pew v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:38 pm
We're getting less fuel per gallon than people in other states. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:41 pm
Last week’s Chace v. [read post]
