Search for: "mark"
Results 8761 - 8780
of 136,219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2020, 4:04 am
Moreover, its advertising makes frequent use of the "LG" mark adjacent the phrase DOOR-IN-DOOR, and so those expenditures prove little. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
" Therefore, even if MAGIC is considered to be dominant in applicant's mark, it does not sufficiently distinguish the involved mark. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 4:49 am
A claim that a mark is merely descriptive relates to the character of the mark at issue, while a claim that matter does not function as a mark is generally tied to the manner in which that matter is used.Moreover, Grape's motion to amend was filed in February 2012, fifteen months after its original counterclaim, after it served its pretrial disclosures (which date had been extended twice), and after ChaCha had filed its motion for summary judgment. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
The involved services overlap, but what about the marks? [read post]
14 May 2024, 3:25 am
None of the soap, fragrance or cosmetic/makeup products are offered under the Anthropologie or Urban Outfitters marks but are third-party products offered under third-party marks. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
The marks are pretty close, aren't they? [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 3:02 am
Also some cases included a refusal of the mark over two different registered marks. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:13 am
Sunpoint International Group USA Corp., Cancellation No. 92057294 [Petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark MAXVOLINE for "lubricants for automobiles" on the grounds of abandonment, nonuse, and likelihood of confusion with the conjointly used and registered marks VALVOLINE and MAXLIFE for lubricants].April 24, 2019 - 1 PM: In re Ocean Technology, Inc., Serial Nos. 87405201, 87405211, and 87405233 [Refusals to register the marks shown below for… [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 2:35 am
A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:33 am
If true, the proposed mark is merely descriptive. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 3:15 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark DASH NEIGHBORHOOD for "retail store services featuring gasoline," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark DASH IN for "retail store services featuring convenience store items and gasoline. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:18 am
Third-party uses of, and media references to, the phrase convinced the Board that INTELLIGENCE OF THINGS does not "perform the desired service mark function and does not fall withing the Act's definition of a service mark. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
Both patent and trade mark will have unitary effect. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 3:02 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark 5 GOLDEN RINGS for "beer; malt liquor," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark GOLD RING for wines. [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:30 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark KOSA for "restaurant and bar services," finding confusion likely with the identical mark registered for "entertainment in the nature of music festivals and live musical performances; entertainment, namely, production of music festivals and live performances featuring music; entertainment, namely, live music concerts. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:01 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark KRISMAS for, inter alia, retail store services featuring holiday merchandise and for entertainment services, finding the mark to be merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 3:06 am
March 27, 2019 - 11 AM: In re Telecom (CHINA) Ltd., Serial No. 87440925 [Section 2(d) of the mark DIRTY LAUNDRY for "Hooded sweatshirts; Jackets; Jeans; Pants; Shirts; Shorts; T-shirts" in light of two registrations for the identical mark, owned by different owners, for "footwear" and for "luggage"].March 28, 2019 - 2 PM: Triatomic Environmental, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 3:26 am
Christina Isaacs, Opposition No. 91232164 [Opposition to registration of the mark RANGER TREK for various goods and services in classes International Classes 16, 18, 21, 25, 26, 28 and 41, and the mark RANGER TREK EXPEDITION JOURNALS & Design for goods and services in classes 16 and 41, on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the allegedly famous common law and registered mark TREK and formatives thereof for a variety of products, including clothing, backpacks,… [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 4:43 am
November 21, 2024 - 11 AM [Virtual]: In re G4 2010, LLC, Serial No. 90281547 [Refusal to register the mark PROMATCH for "drum sticks and percussion instruments" on the ground that the proposed mark identifies a process or system and therefore does not function as a trademark.] [read post]
29 Apr 2025, 6:46 am
The Board found opposer's THOR mark to be arbitrary and conceptually strong, but the mark enjoyed only "average" commercial strength despite opposer's claim of fame. [read post]
