Search for: "v. " Results 8761 - 8780 of 493,694
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2010, 2:22 am by sally
Drew v Whitbread plc Court of Appeal “A party was not precluded from raising a matter before the costs judge on an assessment of costs which it had not raised before the trial judge when he exercised his discretion as to costs. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
Adriona Horton recently published a Case Note on Disability Law Center of Alaska v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 6:02 am by lpbncontracts
In a characteristically insightful blog post, Dave Hoffman uses Vokes v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 2:42 am
Bole and another v Huntsbuild Ltd and another [2009] EWHC 483 (TCC); [2009] WLR (D) 98 “A finding that the premises were in imminent danger of collapse was not a necessary precursor to making a finding under the Defective Premises Act 1972 that a dwelling house was unfit for human habitation; and unfitness for habitation was [...] [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:54 am by ilpc
Here are the materials in Menominee Indian Tribe v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol Charlotte Leskinen, Instituto de Empresa, compares Collective Antitrust Damages Actions in the EU: The Opt-In v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
Steve Evans (University of Leicester School of Law) recently published an article entitled, Should Professionally Drafted Half-Secret Trusts Be Extinct After Larke v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:30 am by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol Giovanni Immordino (Salerno) and Michele Polo (Bocconi) explore Optimal Legal Standards in Antitrust: Traditional v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:27 am by JA Hodnicki
Chang (Global Economics Group) are Analyzing Competition Among Internet Players: Qihoo 360 v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:35 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Eve Brensike Primus (University of Michigan Law School) has posted Effective Trial Counsel after Martinez v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:39 pm by Solomon L. Wisenberg
We are continuing to witness inconsistent jury charges in the wake of the Supreme Court's groundbreaking decision late last term in Ruan v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:10 am by sally
Regina v Barker (Steven) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “It was not necessarily appropriate for a defence advocate to conduct detailed crossexamination of a child witness at trial in respect of evidence purported to undermine that child’s credibility. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:01 am
Andrew Brown v Innovatorone plc and others [2009] EWHC 1376 (Comm); [2009] WLR (D) 205 “A claim form was not effectively served on a solicitor where the solicitor had not notified the claimant in writing that the solicitor had been instructed by the defendant to accept service on behalf of the defendant, and, while it did [...] [read post]