Search for: "AID Holdings, LLC" Results 861 - 880 of 943
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2009, 12:28 pm
Price Products discovered the products being marketed by Juvenile Solutions at an exhibitor’s booth at the ABC Kids Expo held on September 13-16, 2009, at the Las Vegas Convention Center (which is the only reason why an Idaho LLC is apparently suing a California corporation in Nevada district court).M Holdings, LLC et al v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
The court also invoked preemption – holding that the power to recall federally-approved products (the case involved a pre-1976 medical device) properly rested solely with the FDA: I am also persuaded that even if there were state law authority for a notification and recall campaign, such authority would be preempted by the FDCA for the same reasons that there is no implied right of action. . . . [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
The court also invoked preemption – holding that the power to recall federally-approved products (the case involved a pre-1976 medical device) properly rested solely with the FDA: I am also persuaded that even if there were state law authority for a notification and recall campaign, such authority would be preempted by the FDCA for the same reasons that there is no implied right of action. . . . [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
The court also invoked preemption – holding that the power to recall federally-approved products (the case involved a pre-1976 medical device) properly rested solely with the FDA: I am also persuaded that even if there were state law authority for a notification and recall campaign, such authority would be preempted by the FDCA for the same reasons that there is no implied right of action. . . . [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
The court also invoked preemption - holding that the power to recall federally-approved products (the case involved a pre-1976 medical device) properly rested solely with the FDA:I am also persuaded that even if there were state law authority for a notification and recall campaign, such authority would be preempted by the FDCA for the same reasons that there is no implied right of action. . . . [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 5:06 pm
Have a look at Cambria Investment Management, Inc. and Dranger Capital Management, LLC. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 10:55 am
 Over the course of 2000, AOL also sold a significant percentage of its holdings of InfoSpace stock. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:43 am
First Interstate Bank ruling and the 2008 ruling in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 6:51 am
The Specter measure would upend rulings in Stoneridge Investment Partners LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 1:08 am
Having already launched a number of companies -- and sold one -- he's now starting a consultancy called Leave Law Behind through which he'll hold the hands of disillusioned [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:15 pm
This is odd because no broker is supposed to allow a client to hold a negative account. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:11 am
" Holding Granting Heras' motion for a judgment of acquittal on both the conspiracy and aiding and abetting convictions, Judge Sifton pointed out that these two specific intent crimes required that "the purpose - not merely the effect - of the defendant's participation in the crime was to distribute narcotics. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:40 am
In a federal class action filed in Dallas on behalf of Mexican investors, the lawyers accused U.K. insurance giant Willis Group Holdings and smaller Texas insurance broker Bowen, Miclette & Britt of aiding Stanford's alleged fraud by vouching for his investments. [read post]