Search for: "Adams v. United States"
Results 861 - 880
of 2,563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2007, 3:40 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:44 am
Adams Rental, Inc., 938 P.2d 532, 536-37 (Colo. 1997), Wollam v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 2:48 am
United States, Douglas concurred with an opinion that told a story about John Adams. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:35 am
United States, 943 F.Supp. 159, 168 (D.R.I.1996) (articulating the circuit split); see also Ugo Colella & Adam Bain, The Burden of Proving Jurisdiction Under the Federal Torts Claim Act: A Uniform Approach to Allocation, 67 Fordham L.Rev. 2859 (1999). [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 7:45 am
(United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana – Indianapolis Division. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
For example, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s 2010 budget is just $400 million.[2] While many look to CPB to fund children’s programming (among its many other activities), its entire budget is no more than a quarter of the total amount of U.S. advertising revenue produced by children’s programming from food and beverages products alone: $1.6 billion in 2006 by the FTC’s most conservative estimates.[3] That comparison illustrates the vital importance of… [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:58 am
United States, an insider trading case. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 3:58 am
For instance, tariffs on components for products made in the United States may be eliminated, as well as products made by the China operations of US companies. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Samuel Green weighs in on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:35 am
United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 3:07 pm
REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Vote for Stay Tuned with Preet, Webby AwardsAttend Preet’s live conversation with New York City mayor Eric Adams“The Chauvin Prosecutors (with Jerry Blackwell and Steve Schleicher),” Stay Tuned with Preet, 5/6/21United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 2:55 pm
REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Vote for Stay Tuned with Preet, Webby AwardsUnited States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project today amended our complaint in ACLU v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Petty, Accommodating 'Religion', (Tennessee Law Review, Forthcoming).Mohammad Fadel, Religious Law, Family Law and Arbitration: Shari'a and Halakha in America, (Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 1, 2015).Marie Ashe, Hosanna-Tabor, the Ministerial Exemption, and Losses of Equality: Constitutional Law and Religious Privilege in the US, (2 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2015)).Adam Lamparello, Why Chief Justice Roy Moore and the Alabama Supreme Court Just Made the Case… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:40 am
The transcript of oral argument in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May 14, 2012,… [read post]
