Search for: "Allen v. United States" Results 861 - 880 of 1,385
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am by Graeme Hall
The United Kingdom Immigration Law Blog offers a roundup of legal immigration news: Points-based system, switching, etcetera. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
United States, 1990 WL 124496, at *3 (9th Cir. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:08 pm by Greg Mersol
Posted by Greg MersolIt has been a slightly over a month now since the United States Supreme Court announced its blockbuster decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:53 am by Lovechilde
” Ever since Allen v State Board of Elections (1969) the VRA (sections 2 and 5) have been the “go to” weapon in any savvy plaintiff’s arsenal to attack partisan maps that target minority representation and political voting power for dilution. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:13 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
” Ever since Allen v State Board of Elections (1969) the VRA (sections 2 and 5) have been the “go to” weapon in any savvy plaintiff’s arsenal to attack partisan maps that target minority representation and political voting power for dilution. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
THE UNITED KINGDOM – 30089/04 [2011] ECHR 1121 (19 July 2011)  ? [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Don Cruse
Rogelio Casados and Rafaela Casados, No. 10-0523 In re United Scaffolding, Inc., No. 10-0526 Rusk State Hospital v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:30 pm by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/284417.opn.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Supreme Court United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:52 am by Expert Witness Guru
ISP Technologies, Inc., 259 F.3d 924, 929 (8th Cir. 2001) (emphasis added), but “[t]here is less need for the gatekeeper to keep the gate when the gatekeeper is keeping the gate only for himself,” United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
In the light of this case, and indeed others such as P G & J H v United Kingdom (Application 44787/98) and Peck v United Kingdom 44647/98 [2003] ECHR 44 (2003) 36 EHRR 41, it may safely now be said that it is not possible for those who wish to intrude upon the lives of individuals through surveillance, and associated photography, to rely upon a rigid distinction being drawn in their favour what takes place in private and activities capable… [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:45 am by Otto Spijkers
The District Court believed that 'overall control' was decisive, and that the United Nations had such control at all relevant times. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:25 pm by Robert Chesney
Hot on the heels of the fascinating testimony last week from Admiral McRaven and General Allen regarding disposition options for terrorism suspects captured overseas but outside Afghanistan, we learned today about a new case involving an overseas capture of a terrorist carried out by the U.S. military, followed by an extended period of no-Miranda interrogation, followed finally by civilian prosecution in the United States. [read post]