Search for: "BATTLES v. STATE"
Results 861 - 880
of 8,268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
Kravitz * Battle Over LinkedIn Account Between Employer and Employee Largely Gutted--Eagle v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
The furious (and now completely ridiculous) battle over which attorney gets to argue Carcieri v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 8:45 am
United Kingdom (see previous post and comments), the concept again figures prominently in last week's United States Supreme Court decision in Georgia v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 1:53 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
By contrast, courts in California and Canada have found a contractual jurisdiction and applicable law clause invalid as a matter of public policy in order to allow a class action privacy claim to proceed against Facebook.[6] In England, the dual challenge of jurisdiction and collective actions in a mass privacy infringement claim has presented itself before the English Courts, first in Vidal-Hall v Google before the Court of Appeal in 2015[7] and in the Supreme Court judgment of Google… [read post]
14 May 2011, 4:00 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
But to the stated end? [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:17 am
Palmore v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 6:53 am
On Friday, July 19, a Michigan state court judge entered an order declaring that the Local Financial Stability and Choice Act, 2012 PA 436, violates the state constitution to the extent it permits the Michigan Governor to order an emergency manager to proceed under a Chapter 9 bankruptcy “in a manner which threatens to diminish or impair accrued pension benefits” (Webster v Michigan, No 13-734-CZ). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:24 am
Part 4: Palmore v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 9:06 am
Thus, citing McCall v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:50 am
Heller and reaffirmed this right vis-à-vis state laws in McDonald v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
In Blackhorse v. [read post]
Ind. Courts - More on: COA will hear oral arguments today in dispute over Terre Haute mayor's office
9 Jul 2008, 1:35 pm
Bennett - the legal battle for the job of mayor of Terre Haute. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Poor evidence costs McDonald’s its BIG MAC in Supermac attackSupermac’s (Holdings) Ltd v McDonald’s Cancellation No 14 788 C, EUIPO (January 2019)Supermac’s and McDonald’s are locked in a variety of MAC burger battles. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
(Ilya Somin) Virginia was one of several states that enacted a strong eminent domain reform law after the Supreme Court ruled in Kelo v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:36 am
The current law is now stated in the Equality Act 2010 but the issues in this appeal remain pertinent and are not affected by the revocation of the Regulations. [read post]