Search for: "Ball v. Ball" Results 861 - 880 of 3,604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
 * Lantana's lament: no technical contribution, no patent Jeremy gives the floor to Paul England (Taylor Wessing LLP), who recounts the tale of Lantana Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents, Design and Trade Marks [2014] EWCA Civ 1463, a Court of Appeal for England and Wales decision which further explored the oldie-but-goldie issue of software patentability, this time considering a data transfer method.BREAKING 'GOLDEN BALLS' NEWS: the CJEU… [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  Basketball players will bounce a ball the same number of times before a free throw. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 11:35 am by Andrew Dat
After hearing oral arguments last November, the court’s decision for Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:35 am
I like Professor Dellinger's observation: "There is no better example of the false triumph of logic over experience than the 1896 decision in Plessey v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:08 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The Supreme Court yesterday unanimously rejected in American Needle v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 5:11 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Thursday morning read: How the Supreme Court crafted its Roe v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:37 am by Big Tent Democrat
Given the conditions (including the ball) and the relative skills of the teams, this is, in my view, the best strategy for USA. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:21 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
Local authorities therefore use resource allocation systems to provide a “ball-park” figure of the appropriate payment, subject to adjustment. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:11 am by Florian Mueller
Thanks to Twitter coverage by Mike Swift (MLex), Sarah Jeongg (Motherboard, EFF) and Ross Todd (The Recorder), I just had the opportunity to "follow" the Oracle v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 6:01 am by Kit Case
United States Supreme Court Today’s post comes from guest author Jon Rehm from Rehm, Bennett & Moore. [read post]