Search for: "Banning Company v. California"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2013, 10:34 pm
On Thursday, Apple and others filed a brief opposing California’s Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriages in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Hurlbert operates a small California company, Sage Information Services, that obtains public records from real-property assessment officials on behalf of his clients. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:10 am
” At the National Review Online, Ron Unz examines the use of race by Ivy League universities in the wake of the Court’s 1978 ruling in University of California v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court’s willingness to take up the Defense of Marriage Act (which nullifies gay and lesbian marriages for all purposes of federal law) and California’s Proposition 8 (a constitutional ban on marriage equality) this March. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
The case, Ralphs Grocery Company v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
Perry of a request by the backers of California’s “Proposition 8” – which banned same-sex marriage in the state – to file an oversized brief. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:25 am
* Bland v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Barr & Company, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:36 am
Supreme Court’s historic ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 3:24 pm
California - After a daunting thirty-two month patent infringement lawsuit between Apple Inc. and HTC, the two tech giants announced a confidential 10-year licensing agreement that will cover both current and future patents held by both companies. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:39 am
Twitter is a U.S. company. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:34 am
Perkins, 12-126), clarification of how the Internal Revenue Service calculates the foreign tax credit in a case involving a British “windfall tax” on utility companies (PPL Corporation v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 2:32 pm
Fisch In Elijahjuan v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:41 am
By Jennifer Redmond and Suzanna Winslow Wanke v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm
Touchstone Television Productions v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:56 am
But the target date for the actual decision is always four months after the decision (in this case, that's already January), and even if the final decision was an import ban, there would be a 60-day Presidential Review period before it takes effect.In Germany, there are four Samsung v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:49 am
As I said on previous occasions, there will be four Samsung v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:19 pm
Embody v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:19 pm
Embody v. [read post]
