Search for: "Belt v. State" Results 861 - 880 of 1,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2007, 8:16 am
When his lawyer askedfor the stun belt to be removed, the judge refused. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
He was not wearing a seat belt. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 9:30 am by James W. Ward
The Ninth Circuit relied on a California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) opinion letter, which states that employers could specify “basic wardrobe items which are usual and generally usable in the occupation, such as white shirts, dark pants and black shoes and belts, all of unspecified design,” without being required to furnish these items. [read post]
28 May 2012, 10:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Consider the March 29, 2012 decision of the Appellate Division, Third Department, in Hirsch v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 6:16 am
After the plaintiff got in, but before she was able to put on her seat belt, the accident occurred. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  As the balance of federal and state regulatory authority shifts, at what point is the “tradition” is upended? [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 6:27 pm by Joy Waltemath
The agreement states that Leadpoint is the sole employer of the personnel it supplies. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Major Connecticut-based corporations are decamping to other states, reducing their in-state footprint, or being acquired by out-of-state firms, including, most recently, the merger of the Massachusetts-based Raytheon Company with the Connecticut-based United Technologies, with the new company to be headquartered in the Boston area.[16] Here too, relocations are not primarily to the Sun Belt, but toward places like New York City, Boston, and Chicago. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
These miserly limitations on compensation for negligence by state and local entities have rightly received a torrent of criticism lately following the Indiana State Fair stage collapse. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:59 pm by Adam Gillette
This conclusion is at odds with one reached by the Eighth Circuit in Sasser v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:00 am
Similarly, statements Fennell made concerning the use of a belt to strangle someone as a way to avoid fingerprints were not conveyed to the State until after Reed had been tried. [read post]