Search for: "Blakely v. State" Results 861 - 880 of 923
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
The latter point is especially unpersuasive: in the Sixth Amendment arena, not a single Circuit anticipated Apprendi or Blakely. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Justice Blake considered the relevant principles to be applied in relation to the PSEDs, as summarised in R(Boyejo & Ors) v Barnett LBC and Smith v Portsmouth CC [2009] EWHC (Admin) 755. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Sentencing Law and Policy blog, Douglas Berman considers Monday’s decision in Dean v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 5:37 pm by Howard Knopf
For reasons that are far from apparent, AUCC negotiated renewed arrangements following CCH v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Angela Swan
Blake, [2000] UKHL 45, [2001] 1 A.C. 268 (H.L.) [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am by Christopher J. Walker
Federalist Society Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation Thursday, January 6, noon-1PM In West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
In Cadwalladr, the Court of Appeal also confirmed that “publication” for the purposes of section 1(1) (and indeed, the 2013 Act as a whole unless otherwise stated) continued to have its common law meaning – a communication of the statement to someone other than the claimant – and that each single communication is a separate and actionable tort. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:29 am by SHG
The incident, Fitzgerald says, is based on a 2008 homicide case, State of Alabama v. [read post]