Search for: "Board of Veterans Appeals"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
Therefore, many people (both on the Dorf on Law comments board, as well as in the political debate in Washington) have understandably been asking probing questions about the details of the constitutional argument. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 7:50 am
The board can then hear appeals. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/285731.opn.doc.pdf In a dissent, Judge Korsmo argued that both the veteran officer and the veteran trial judge believed there had been probable cause for the stop, and that decision should not be disturbed. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 5:54 am
The Court of Appeals affirms, but on an alternate ground. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:04 am
Fromer again appealed. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Titan Corp.Docket: 09-1313Issue(s): 1) Whether the court of appeals erred by finding that claims for torture and other war crimes cannot be brought against private actors under the Alien Tort Statute; and 2) whether the court of appeals erred by creating a “battle-field preemption” doctrine that extends derivative sovereign immunity to contractors.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (DC Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief of CACI International in oppositionBrief… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:58 am
In 1993, a veteran lead engineer was operating a train in heavy fog when he spotted a red stop light at an approaching intersection with another rail line. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
Holder, 10-940, seek to resolve a circuit split on whether federal courts of appeals have jurisdiction to review denials by the Board of Immigration Appeals of motions to reopen removal proceedings sua sponte — a question the Court expressly reserved last Term in Kucana v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
HolderDocket: 10-920Issue(s): (1) Whether federal courts are categorically incompetent to review a Board of Immigration Appeals decision denying a motion to reopen removal proceedings sua sponte, even where that decision applies a legal standard, on the ground that such decisions are "committed to agency discretion by law"; and (2) whether the court of appeals erred by disregarding the BIA’s stated grounds for its decision, in conflict with SEC v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:23 am
Our firm represents veterans and their families across the United States in appeals to the Board of Veterans Appeals and the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2011, 7:35 pm
Board certified in labor and employment law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization with extensive leading edge health plan experience, Ms. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:39 am
And: Veteran defense lawyer Stanley Schneider is still stung by the rebuffed appeal of his client, John Matamoros, who murdered Edward George Goebel during a 1990 burglary of his home. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:29 am
Fromer’s application for unemployment insurance was rejected by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm
Hawley Postscript: Bad Facts Don’t Help on Appeal - http://tinyurl.com/4xl8hdb (John Tredennick) Recovering eDiscovery Costs as a Prevailing Party - http://tinyurl.com/3oxuc6v (Christine Soares) Riding the Waves of Early Case Assessment - http://tinyurl.com/67zu9x4 (George Rudoy) Safe Harbor: Why EU Data Needs 'Protecting' from US Law - http://tinyurl.com/43r27gf (Zack Whittaker) Should Government Agencies Be Able To Exempt Themselves From The Privacy Act? [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:29 pm
Geitner combines a Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) appeal and a Veterans Employment Opportunity Act (VEOA) case. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
" President Obama is apparently on board. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:07 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
Other considerations, such as an individual’s, or an individual’s spouse’s, status as a veteran may also have an impact on an employee’s rights.It bears repeating that in order to determine the rights of a particular individua [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
Failed to comply with the ruling of the Court of Appeals in Professional, Clerical and Technical Employees Association v Buffalo Board of Education, 90 NY2d 364.In PCTEA v Buffalo, the Court of Appeals held that no strong public policy prohibits an appointing authority from agreeing through collective negotiations to give promotional preference to certain members on an eligible list where a probationary period precedes their permanent appointment. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am
” (Thanks to How Appealing for the link.) [read post]
