Search for: "Boring v. State"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Employer advised the Office of the State Comptroller of Plaintiff's fraudulent time submissions. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 1:36 pm
The case is Dennis Flaherty v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:09 am
By its decision, the petitioners state, the Sixth Circuit has exacerbated an existing circuit split by refusing to recognize an implied private right of action under Section 36(a). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
Miller v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:21 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 8:11 am
Simply stated, when {Grievant] placed his own perceived self-interest over the safety of the community by lying about his fitness to serve, he demonstrated that he is not fit to serve. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:40 am
TransmissionsTeamet i Stockholm AB (TT) imported, marketed and sold counterfeit ball bearings which bore the Community trade mark SKF. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:53 am
The Topps Company, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 8:26 am
” United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 8:34 am
"Stevens Law Office v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 8:57 pm
On March 13, 2014, the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Property Reserve, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
According to the claimants, those two signs were nothing but the handles of Yoshida’s typical knives, many of which bore concave dots to prevent the knife handle from slipping. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:40 am
In February 2020, these discussion bore fruit. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
This said, a collection of multiple NFTs is actually a collection of multiple, non-fungible, products similar in kind to a physical product produced and sold in a series although within a limited edition.As a sidenote, it is also worth noting that the forthcoming EU Market in Crypto Assets Regulation (MICA) states that “the issuance of crypto-assets as non-fungible tokens in a large series or collection should be considered as an indicator of their fungibility” (Recital 6c, last… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 11:49 am
The evidence revealed that the truck’s entire brake system was in an advanced state of wear and bore signs of significant anomalies and a major imbalance. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:00 am
"Something else" needs to occur.In Dlugosz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 12:44 pm
Korn v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 8:17 am
As in McIntosh v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
" See, e.g., State v. [read post]
