Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 861 - 880
of 8,116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
Under Los Angeles v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:15 am
The state Supreme Court in that recent high-profile case, Abigaile Lebron v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:05 am
Claiming exempt volunteer firefighter status for the purposes of Civil Service Law §75.1(b)Serviss v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 2018 NY Slip Op 05597, Appellate Division, Second Department§75.1 of the Civil Service Laws generally bars the termination of a tenured officer or employee in the Competitive Class of Classified Service of the State or a political subdivision of the State "except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 7:14 am
United States, No. 14-419. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:07 am
Varnum When the Iowa Supreme Court decided the Varnum v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:22 pm
” And Don Verrilli, arguing on behalf of North Carolina executive-branch officials, suggested a possible test, which he characterized as the “best distillation” of Rehnquist’s concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
On July 18, 2007, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the United States Government's interpretation of the Treaty of Amity between the United States and Iran, and affirmed an earlier decision allowing American plaintiffs to sue Iran in U.S. courts under Article IV(2) of the Treaty: McKesson Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:24 am
Arkansas, to Yeager v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
” Fitzgerald v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:40 pm
The first case, Biden v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 7:05 pm
Background In CFMEU Queensland District Branch v Workpac Pty Ltd [2017] FWC 1995 WorkPac had been negotiating with the CFMEU for a replacement enterprise agreement for almost a year. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:31 am
(Eugene Volokh) After a long discussion of the breadth of the speech restriction involved in the case, Chief Justice Roberts’ majority in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 11:01 am
The bill’s memo states that the law would establish the State of New York as the employer of “anyone serving in the executive, judiciary, and legislative branches, including the staff of elected officials or judges. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
This term, the Court has limited not only agencies and the Executive branch, but also Congress – thereby allocating the real authority to decide to itself. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
Scott v McCarty, 41 So. 3d 989 (Fla.4th DCA 2010). [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
Scott v McCarty, 41 So. 3d 989 (Fla.4th DCA 2010). [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 7:55 am
Clark responded in the negative and reasoned it was because the executive branch and not the judicial branch is meant to handle exigent circumstances. [read post]
