Search for: "Brown v. United States" Results 861 - 880 of 4,222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Jackson is also often quoted for his statement about the Supreme Court in Brown v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
"In September 1957, President Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas National Guard and sent 1000 members of the 101st Airborne Division into Little Rock to desegregate Central Highschool in the wake of the Brown v Board of Ed decision. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am by Ronald Collins and David Skover
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:01 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that the pretrial freeze of a criminal defendant’s untainted assets violates the Sixth Amendment right to counsel of choice. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm by Conor McEvily
Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943); and (2) whether a binding agreement among multiple states, with both intra- and interstate effects, violates the Compact Clause, Article I, § 10, cl. 3 of the United States Constitution, in the absence of congressional approval.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorari [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:34 am by Brian Raum
Brown. — Recently, ACLU Executive Director Anthony D. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:13 am by Joshua Matz
A federal district judge in New York has ruled that the federal government must disclose internal e-mails to reveal whether it may have misled the Supreme Court about its policies on helping improperly deported immigrants return to the United States in Nken v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
When President Obama recently announced that he was taking action to permit over four million undocumented immigrants to remain in the United States for two years without fear of deportation, Republicans cried foul. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:34 am by Diana L. Skaggs
      Although family mobility has been global for decades, the United States Supreme Court, for the first time,[1] has interpreted a provision of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, a treaty to which the United States is a contracting state. [read post]