Search for: "Bruce v State" Results 861 - 880 of 2,335
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2009, 6:24 am
In Jayne Dunnum v Dept of Employee Trust Funds, Wisconsin's Dane County Circuit Court ruled (at page 28) that the new law does not violate the state's "super DOMA" amendment. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case involving mandatory deportation, TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 10:23 am
After all, Jack's great colleague Bruce Ackerman basically agrees that the New Deal required a constitutional transformation, a "non-Article V constitutional amendment," and I basically agree. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:43 am by Meg Martin
Both Sweet and the State recognized that in Pendleton v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 4:00 pm
This is precisely what happened with the state congressional district maps (for the state senate and state assembly lines). [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 4:00 pm
This is precisely what happened with the state congressional district maps (for the state senate and state assembly lines). [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
Our second new relist is Bruce v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:56 am by Meg Martin
Tangeman of Nicholas & Tangeman, LLC, Laramie, Wyoming.Representing Appellee State: Bruce A. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 7:30 am by Robert Brammer
Mourtada-Sabbah, Nada & Cain, Bruce, eds. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 9:55 am
Representing Appellee State: Bruce A. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 3:43 am by INFORRM
For the respondents: Bruce McClintock SC and Matthew Richardson instructed by Mark O’Brien, Paul Svilans and Andrea Rejante of Johnson Winter & Slattery. [read post]