Search for: "Buck v State" Results 861 - 880 of 1,172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Assuming the choice is between tax cuts for the wealthy and increased spending on infrastructure – directly or through states and localities – there is much more bang for the buck in taking care of the nation’s infrastructure. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
These include information on the applicant's race, religion, national origin, age, pregnancy status, marital status, disability, sexual orientation (some state and local jurisdictions), gender expression or identity (some state and local jurisdictions) and genetic information. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
To belittle her story as merely an attempt to make a fast buck by betraying her former lover is a cliché in itself. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:39 am by SHG
  But that's why they pay them the big bucks. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am by Adam Thierer
” If a majority of the Justices choose to side with the State of California and open the floodgates to a new era of speech regulation, I very much looking forward to seeing how they reconcile that with their decision last term in the controversial case of United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm by NL
Now that is clarified, and any confusion/buck passing between the Local Authority and NASS sorted out. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm by NL
Now that is clarified, and any confusion/buck passing between the Local Authority and NASS sorted out. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm by charonqc
As can be shown from Hirst v UK (No2), the Separation of Powers is ineffective. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 7:01 am
US Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit: Byrne v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:53 pm by Rick
Then in 2003, the State Legislature got into the Act. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States (2009) and the immigration case of Fernandez-Vargas v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:25 am by Jeff Lipshaw
  I move to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and the school cites Wright v. [read post]