Search for: "COX V STATE" Results 861 - 880 of 1,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am by Charon QC
Idly fumbling through the electronic annals of Parliament House, the humble case of Daniel Cox v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Jon McLaughlin
"[18]   The Goslin court not only reversed the trial court, but it instructed the trial court to allow the petitioner to amend her petition since the record was absent of any representation regarding her residence at the time of filing.[19]  Also on point is federal case law from within our State.[20] In Davis v Davis, 638 F Supp 862 (ND Ill 1986), the petitioner had not been a resident of Illinois for 90 days preceding the filing of her petition. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Had issuers supported the proposal by the Cox Commission, it is likely that Mary Schapiro's Commission would not have proposed an access rule, Dodd-Frank would not have given access authority to the Commission, and shareholders would not now be singularly focused on the issue. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:24 am by Mandelman
Look… I’m terribly sorry to all of those that I couldn’t seat personally… oh, wait… it’s Matt Weidner, Glenn Russell, Tom Cox, Walter Hackett, and I see you brought a whole team of foreclosure defense attorneys with you… that’s wonderful… just fill in wherever you find seats, the curtain is about to rise… Ladies and gentlemen… it’s time for the premier of… ring, ring… oh, that’s my cell,… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:45 am
", proclaimed copyright consultant and 1709 Blogger Hugo Cox in his appraisal of the present state of copyright protection and enforcement. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm by Dwayne Clark
He alleges he was injured on March 24 while working aboard the M/V Audrey. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:16 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Mississippi Rule of Evidence 803(4) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations,... [read post]