Search for: "CRIM"
Results 861 - 880
of 4,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2011, 4:12 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Auton & Ors v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 76 (03 February 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Islam & Anor v Al- Sami & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 32 (03 February 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Wollenberg v Casinos Austria International Holding GmbH [2011] EWHC 103 (Ch) (03 February 2011) Hobbs & Anor v Gibson & Ors [2010] EWHC 3676 (Ch) (17 December 2010) Rosebery Ltd v Rocklee Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC B1 (Ch) (20 January 2011) … [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:53 am
Dorset County Council v House [2010] EWCA Crim 2270; [2010] WLR (D) 253 “Criminal liability under the Cattle Identification Regulations 1998 and the Cattle Database Regulations 1998 was expressly and exclusively defined in terms of a failure to carry out an obligation under Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97, so there was no criminal offence in respect of conduct after 20 July 2000 when Regulation 820/97 was repealed and replaced. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
Regina v Burke (Michael) [2012] EWCA Crim 770; [2012] WLR (D) 119 “Where a defendant had been charged with an offence of voyeurism but had been found to be under a disability so that he was unfit to plead or to stand trial, the ingredients of ‘the act…charged against him as the offence’, for the purposes of section 4A(2) of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964, included a requirement to prove that his act had been for the purpose of sexual gratification. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:55 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) PD, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 19 (26 January 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench) QBE Management Services (UK) Ltd v Dymoke & Ors [2012] EWHC 80 (QB) (27 January 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Concept Elite Inc v (Thames Enterprises Ltd & Ors [2012] EWHC 94 (Ch) (27 January 2012) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) ACD (Landscape Architects) Ltd v Overall & Anor [2012] EWHC 100 (TCC) (27 January 2012) Source:… [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:44 am
R v Zafar; R v Malik; R v Raja; R v Iqbal; R v Butt [2008] EWCA Crim 184; [2008] WLR (D) 51 “A person possessed an article for terrorist purposes if he possessed it in circumstances which gave rise to a reasonable suspicion that he intended it to be used for the purpose of the commission, preparation or instigation of an act of terrorism. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:23 am
Regina v F and M [2010] EWCA Crim 2437; [2010] WLR (D) 276 “An Order in Council, made pursuant to s 1 of the United Nations Act 1946 to give effect to a United Nations Security Council Resolution, could include the creation of a serious criminal offence for a breach of the Order, even though there was a substantial delay between the adoption of the Resolution and the creation of the offence. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:09 am
Regina v George and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1148; [2010] WLR (D) 147 “Where a statute imposed criminal liability on an individual who dishonestly agreed with one or more other people to do a prohibited act, the intention and purpose was to criminalise that individual, regardless of whether those other persons were also dishonest. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:04 am
Regina v Inglis [2010] EWCA Crim 2637; [2010] WLR (D) 289 “When determining the minimum specified term to be served by an individual who genuinely believed that the murder she had committed constituted an act of mercy, the facts that there had been a significant degree of planning or premeditation, that the victim had been particularly vulnerable because of disability and that there had been abuse of a position of trust should not be taken to be aggravating factors. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
Regina v Grout [2011] EWCA Crim 299; [2011] WLR (D) 70 “Care had to be taken when drafting a count in an indictment alleging an offence contrary to section 8(1) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 because that section created at least two separate offences: (i) causing a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity and (ii) inciting a child under 13 to engage in a sexual activity. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:30 am
Regina v W [2010] EWCA Crim 372; [2010] WLR (D) 61 “Where the crime of misconduct in a public office was committed in circumstances involving the acquisition of property by theft or fraud, particularly when the holder of a public office was alleged to have made improper claims for public funds in circumstances which were said to be criminal, proof that the defendant was dishonest was an essential ingredient of the offence. [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:17 am
Regina v Y (A) [2010] EWCA Crim 762; [2010] WLR (D) 112 “Where a person possessed information likely to be useful to a terrorist within the meaning of s 58(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000, the fact that the possession was for the purpose of lawful self-defence which was solely defensive was capable of amounting to the statutory defence of reasonable excuse under s 58(3) of the 2000 Act, to an offence of possession under s 58(1). [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:48 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) El Hudarey, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1761 (11 July 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Slough Borough Council & Anor v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWHC 1977 (Admin) (11 August 2008) Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP [2008] EWHC 2001 (Admin) (12 August 2008) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Adams & Anor v Scottish and Southern Energy Plc & Anor [2008] EWHC 1926 (TCC)… [read post]
1 May 2009, 7:06 am
Crim. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:47 am
Regina v Dunn [2010] EWCA Crim 1823; [2010] WLR (D) 207 “The fact that an appeal from the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division only lay to the Supreme Court if the Court of Appeal certified that a point of law of general public importance was involved in its decision did not amount to a denial of the essence of an appellant’s right of access to the Supreme Court and was not incompatible with articles 6 and 14 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental… [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:57 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) A, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2908 (01 December 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Sivapalan & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 2955 (Admin) (01 December 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Tiscali UK Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc [2008] EWHC 2927 (QB) (01 December 2008) Source: www.bailii.org… [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 1:47 am
Rana Singh [2007] EWCA Crim 1888 “Where a judge had misdirected a jury owing to a defect in the indictment and the misdirection went to the heart of the issue between the defendant and the Crown, the conviction would be unsafe even if the indictment could have been amended so that the facts relied on would amount to the offence charged, and even where the case against the defendant was very strong. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 8:36 am
R v Ibrahim and others [2008] EWCA Crim 880; [2008] WLR (D) 127 “Evidence obtained during ’safety’ interviews conducted with a defendant under the provisions of the Terrorism Act 2000 was admissible at his subsequent trial subject to the ordinary principles governing a fair trial, and the over-arching provisions in s 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:58 am
Crim. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:15 am
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2010] EWCA Crim 571; [2010] WLR (D) 135 “An employee who suffered damage as a result of findings of personal or professional misconduct leading to dismissal and loss of professional status that were made against him in disciplinary proceedings conducted in breach of contract, and which would not otherwise have been made, could recover damages at large. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:38 am
King v Serious Fraud Office [2008] EWCA Crim 530; [2008] WLR (D) 147 “Arts 6, 7 and 8 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Requests and Orders) Order 2005, read as a whole, provided a scheme to make a restraint order in response to an external request only in respect of property in England and Wales. [read post]
