Search for: "Change v. State"
Results 861 - 880
of 50,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm
[#Air, #CA3] U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 6:11 pm
Although it can reverse statutory decisions, Congress is not able to supersede the Court's constitutional rules because it cannot change the source of law being interpreted - the Constitution - outside of the amendment process of Article V. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:11 am
See e.g., Sharps v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 2:47 pm
In Grau v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 11:40 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of R(C) v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:20 am
Applied in a principled way, Chiafalo changes the scope of any legislative superpower. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 7:00 pm
Yet as the AG becomes “the People’s lawyer” instead of general counsel for the state’s executive branch, the people will turn to the AG instead of groups like the Sierra Club to litigate for tangible changes in regulatory policy. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:25 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:33 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:09 am
Arizona v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
A 1781 Pennsylvania state court case against the state of Virginia, Nathan v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 1:24 am
Congressman Luis V. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Bruen and RahimiTwo years ago, in New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 12:08 pm
Due to litigation in a case that I filed in front of the New Jersey Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
In American Freedom Defense Initiative v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:49 am
While many individual States are attempting to or have already passed controversial new laws regarding immigration, the Obama administration has taken bold steps to dramatically change deportation enforcement throughout the country. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:45 am
Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court heard a case, United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:54 am
This hasn't changed substantially since our earlier FAQ published nearly three years ago. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
Weiss & Assocs v. [read post]
