Search for: "Citizens for Constitutional Integrity" Results 861 - 880 of 2,601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Circuit panel held that a citizen has no constitutional remedy for Fourth and Fifth Amendment violations committed by federal agents when the abuses occur in a counterterrorism investigation overseas. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
Washington's Public Records Act generally provides that citizens can apply for access to any public record, with some listed exceptions that don't apply to this case. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
I take a different view: One of the most important things the Constitution constitutes is a conversational community -- in which engaged participants talk to one another, not at another, as they confront the political challenges of the present and future. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:35 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
But, the fact remains that a citizen is afraid to go to Police Station in this country and a citizen is also afraid to approach Courts except the Constitutional Courts as justice is quickly delivered still by the Constitutional Courts. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 8:20 am by Kurt Bassuener
” It is precisely black-letter Dayton that stipulates the makeup of the Constitutional Court (with three foreign judges among the nine), the checks inherent in the institution and powers of the international High Representative (Annex 10), and the guarantee for the country’s security and territorial integrity (Annex 1A and Annex 2). [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:37 am by Steven Smith
  Many religious citizens feel marginalized by constitutional doctrines suggesting that religion must be purely private (Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln notwithstanding) while public affairs and expressions must be secular. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 6:12 am by Jack Goldsmith
  I doubt that the nature and scope of any such attacks would fit the need to protect American persons and property, but some prior OLC opinions state that legitimate interventions to protect U.S. citizens can also justify protection of non-U.S. citizens. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 10:07 am by Christine Kirchberger
“In shifting from infrastructure to integration and then to transformation, a more holistic framework of connected governance is required. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:51 am by Ilya Somin
This argument ignores the longstanding role of states in enforcing and adjudicating other constitutional qualifications for candidates for federal office, such as the requirements that the president must be 35 years old, and a "natural born" citizen of the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 10:25 am by The Charge
  The Fifteenth Amendment guaranteed the right of all citizens to vote (okay, in theory it guaranteed all citizens the right to vote…)  These two constitutional amendments acted to limit sovereignty of states regarding property rights, humanity, and how to determine democratic representation in the federal government. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:33 am by Ana Popovich
” As part of the settlement, Arthrex “entered into a five-year corporate integrity agreement with HHS-OIG. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am by INFORRM
Public order cases involving protests have always sparked controversy, with the collision between the state’s responsibility to ensure the smooth running of civil society and the individual citizen’s right to draw attention to what they regard as a pressing moral concern. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 5:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The case went up to the Constitutional Court, which decided to make the request for a preliminary ruling. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Jared Beck
Completely absent from the campaign rhetoric is any real effort to describe a viable strategy for either (1) getting the Supreme Court to overturn the case; or (2) amending the Constitution — that is, the two possible paths available in the American political system for overriding a constitutional law ruling from the Supreme Court, such as Citizens United. [read post]
The EIF had briefly considered the issue of qualification recognition at its fourth,[17] eighth[18] and ninth[19] meetings—notwithstanding that it had been envisaged to constitute a significant aspect of its work from the outset[20]—but quite full consideration was given to the issue at the EMF’s meeting in 2018. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:59 pm by Josh Blackman
The President possesses "extraordinary power to speak to his fellow citizens and on their behalf. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:59 am by SHG
It’s only weapon is integrity, the trust of a nation that its rulings matter. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
Pena dissent  to distinguish discriminatory from acceptable affirmative action policies, or, most recently, the pungent conclusion from his Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
  The ballot restrictions there were permissible because they “served the state interest in protecting the integrity and regularity of the election process, an interest independent of any attempt to evade the constitutional prohibition against the imposition of additional qualifications for service in Congress. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
  The ballot restrictions there were permissible because they “served the state interest in protecting the integrity and regularity of the election process, an interest independent of any attempt to evade the constitutional prohibition against the imposition of additional qualifications for service in Congress. [read post]