Search for: "Coca-Cola Company, The"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,379
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2011, 6:23 am
Not a bad message. http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/dynamic/press_center/2011/12/coca-cola-secret-formula-moves-to-the-world-of-coca-cola.html [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 7:21 am
” As VP for Public Affairs & Communications at Coca-Cola Enterprises, Curtis gets to do just that. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:11 am
For example Coca Cola who have a page on their website which highlights some of the myths about Coca Cola and provides the answers to these myths. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:20 am
In the global market Coca–Cola® have famously protected their recipe for many a decade, and the giants of Apple® and Microsoft® develop their products in secrecy to prevent their rivals stealing a march upon them. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:07 pm
The six-pack of Coca-Cola he drank each day? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
The Coca Cola Company, No. 11-11317 (11th Cir. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
The Coca-Cola Company v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:59 am
We have assembled an extraordinary faculty of attorneys from the nation’s top firms, a full panel of distinguished jurists, and in-house counsel from CBS, Bank of America, IBM, Ryder System, Bayer, Citigroup, Canam Steel, Family Dollar Stores, Northrop Grumman, Interval International, Coca Cola, Ally Financial, PSEG, DHL Global Forwarding, Viacom, Paychex, Direct TV, and many others. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 10:01 pm
The only stipulations were that the suggested name must not be (i) a famous trade mark (eg "The Google" or the "Coca-Cola"), (ii) a rude word or term of abuse in any of the official languages of the countries of the Eurozone or (iii) the name of a politician (eg "The Sarkozy" or "The Berlusconi") Some suggestions demonstrated a certain lack of enthusiasm for the European single currency: The Argh (Stein Roar Gjøen, Acapo, Norway):… [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:48 am
" The article goes on to discuss the following good branding of Western companies/products in China: Coca-Cola. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:34 pm
PEER claims it has heard “from NPS employees that a major gift from Coca Cola to the National Park Foundation . . . was made contingent on lifting the Grand Canyon bottle ban. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:40 pm
What if those same parents had standing to sue the companies that make the high-sugar, high-fat foods their children ate? [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 9:25 am
But it is telling that even in 1893, the owners of the Coca Cola Company knew the importance of registering their mark. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
Lucas had been an employee of the Coca-Cola Company, and was covered by its LTD plan (the "Plan"). [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
"Culinary" demos were offered by cooking experts such as Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Hershey, and McNeil (maker of the fake sugar, Splenda). [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:14 am
(IAM) Patent war between Nongfushanquan and Coca Cola / ??????????????????? [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:21 am
Neither Coca-Cola nor financial services companies like Higher One has students best interest at heart. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am
Only those marks that are rock stars in the trademark world -- think Nike or Coca-Cola -- can claim a likelihood of expanding into a broad array of goods and services, and more importantly can prevent another company's use of their famous mark because a third-party use dilutes it.Domain names and trademarks. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am
Only those marks that are rock stars in the trademark world -- think Nike or Coca-Cola -- can claim a likelihood of expanding into a broad array of goods and services, and more importantly can prevent another company's use of their famous mark because a third-party use dilutes it.Domain names and trademarks. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:36 am
The Coca-Cola Company, Opposition No. 91178953 [Consolidated Section 2(e)(1) opposition to several applications filed by Coca-Cola for marks containing the word ZERO for beverages, on the ground that ZERO is merely descriptive and lacks secondary meaning].October 18, 2011 - 10 AM: In re Sonex Research, Inc., Serial No. 77435929 [Section 2(d) refusal of SONEX for "internal combustion engines for manned aerial vehicles and systems," in view of… [read post]
