Search for: "Competitor Group, Inc. " Results 861 - 880 of 1,447
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2012, 9:00 am
 The plaintiffs, United States Marine Inc. and VT Halter Marine Inc., charged the Navy had disclosed designs for a high-speed military vessel to a competitor. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:20 pm by WIMS
 Meanwhile, our competitors and potential competitors in the developing world continue to press ahead aggressively to court new energy companies and the talent that will develop the next innovations. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:44 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  While Xu apparently denied that he was leaving to join a competitor, SI Group alleges in the complaint that Xu in fact joined Sino Legend (Zhangjiagang) Chemical Co., Ltd., Sino Legend Holding Group, Inc., Sino Legend Holding Group Ltd., HongKong Sino Legend Group Ltd., Ning Zhang, and Quanhai Yang (collectively, “Sino Legend”). [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of the American Immigration Lawyers AssociationAmicus brief of Law Professors (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Former Federal Prosecutors, et al.Amicus brief of Immigration Law ProfessorsAmicus brief of National Legal Aid & Defenders Association and Public CounselAmicus brief of Criminal Law Professors Reply of petitioner (forthcoming) Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:53 am
Disability Group, Inc., the plaintiffs and defendants were in competition for social security disability claimants. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Schutz Container Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:25 am by Eric
Spartz, Inc. * Employee's Twitter and Facebook Impersonation Claims Against Employer Move Forward -- Maremont v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm by admin
New foreign competitors continue to enter the Canadian market, bringing world-class competitive capabilities. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm by Geri Haight
”  The lower court relied too heavily on the Second Circuit’s decision in Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc.,  which rejected a contributory infringement claim against the Internet auction site based on use of the TIFFANY’S trademark by jewelry counterfeiters on the site. [read post]