Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 861 - 880
of 48,937
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
In DeSaulles v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 5:47 pm
Quinby v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:19 am
In a recent case, Matarrazo v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 10:59 am
As a followup to an analysis of LEED v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:53 am
While the ECJ’s decision in Schrems v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 8:18 pm
I’m just glad I didn’t try to do this with the Court of Appeal judgment in Motto v Trafigura [2011] EWCA Civ 1150. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:21 am
Case in point is a recent decision from Ontario Manary v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 5:15 am
Ever since the Supreme Court decided KSR v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 1:30 pm
The court commented:Litigation has now been on foot for almost eight years and has cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal costs. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
New Jersey children suing their parents for college costs have been in the news frequently in recent months. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:04 am
Similarly, in Sud v London Borough of Ealing, the Court of Appeal upheld the Tribunal’s order that the Claimant should pay 50% of the Respondent’s costs (likely to be substantial). [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 7:26 am
In Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 8:45 am
P.F.V. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:12 am
The Court of Appeal has ruled that it can be within a court's discretion to reduce a successful defendant's costs award by two thirds because of lies told during the trial.In Sulaman v AXA Insurance and Direct Line Insurance [2009] EWCA Civ 1331, the appellant was appealing against the first instance decision that her costs be reduced by two thirds because she had lied to the court in two respects while giving evidence.Sulaman was suspected of being part of a… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am
Voter Verified, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:03 pm
City and County of Honolulu v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 1:33 am
[2] Zubulake v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:19 pm
Apache Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:35 am
The two pertinent provisions of the Bill are section 2, imposing a quasi-tortious liability on insurers/compensators for the cost of NHS services to be provided to victims of asbestos related diseases, and section 14 which extended the liability under the employers’ liability insurance policy to an extent greater than the liability would have been if charges payable to the Welsh NHS had been paid as damages by the employer to the employee; see Durham v BAI (Run-OFF)… [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 2:33 am
O’Beirne v Hudson Court of Appeal “Where a consent order provided for costs to be assessed on the standard basis, the costs judge was not entitled to vary that order or tie himself to assessing by reference to the small claims track. [read post]
