Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 861 - 880
of 14,560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2023, 2:15 pm
One of the many amici who have filed briefs in a Supreme Court case asking the Court to overrule its precedent in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:15 pm
One of the many amici who have filed briefs in a Supreme Court case asking the Court to overrule its precedent in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:41 am
Builders moved to dismiss the case, arguing that in common pleas court a claimant may seek to participate in the workers’ compensation fund only for those conditions addressed in the administrative order. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:30 am
Judge May held that under the Supreme Court’s 1991 precedent in Freytag v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Under court decisions interpreting the federal court settlement in the Flores v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:06 am
Colvin, October 21, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 5:31 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 3:57 am
Case of police officer's assistance in a forced catheterization at a doctor's request entitled the officer to qualified immunity. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 10:52 am
Had the officer spoken to the citizen before pulling over the defendant's vehicle, this court may well have reached a different decision. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Ultimately the Court of Appeals considered the matter in terms of a court's authority to overturn or modify an administrative disciplinary decision or a disciplinary penalty imposed on a worker [Kelly v Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32].The Court of Appeals, ruled:1. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:40 am
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has excluded evidence obtained from the cellphone of the defendant in Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:40 am
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has excluded evidence obtained from the cellphone of the defendant in Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 5:24 am
Schaefer-LaRose v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 7:57 am
, 2007 Patently–O Patent L.J. 21, 25 (2007) (concluding that administrative patent judges are officers as opposed to mere employees). [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
Gore, someone had proposed as a testable hypothesis that an administration that took office thanks to a court ruling of dubious fidelity to stated norms of the rule of law would govern in defiance of those norms.What would we say today about that hypothesis? [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 7:27 pm
Quoting the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Lisa v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 7:10 am
Guiding each of the Court’s recent decisions is Myers v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 4:31 pm
The Supreme Court in Castrovinci v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:18 am
The Supreme Court will hear argument on these questions on November 28, 2007, in Rowe v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:26 am
Wade Stancil v. [read post]
