Search for: "Crawford, Appeal of" Results 861 - 880 of 1,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2008, 10:05 am
On the appeal, the circuit ruled that the judge had abused his discretion in barring the questioning. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:49 pm
If it is, then the reports would be subject to the Confrontation Clause in the Sixth Amendment as determined in Crawford v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:07 am
As for the courts of appeals… Civil. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 1:04 pm
The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces nixed the Crawford prohibition on urinalysis laboratory reports in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
Washington…”: Since Crawford, it added, “state supreme courts and the federal courts of appeals have become deeply divided. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 3:03 pm
Why no one led with this tidbit of information is beyond me.No underlying opinion as appeal of a death penalty is automatic to the CCA.Juan Ramon Meza Segundo v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
Page 2 Cassens Transport Company ("Cassens"), Crawford & Company ("Crawford"), and Dr. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 11:26 am
" For similar reasons, the testimony violated Crawford by communicating the testimonial statements of cooperating witnesses and confidential informants directly to the jury in the guise of an expert opinion.Finally, the court concluded that the error was not harmless. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 9:57 am
The decision didn't hinge on the police misconduct in obtaining Guidry's confession; the Fifth Circuit opinion doesn't even mention misconduct.This is a pre-Crawford Confrontation-Clause case. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
In Crawford, the majority notes, the Supreme Court expressed approval its prior decision Tennessee v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 4:58 am
The appeal arose out of a case between Vicky Crawford and her longtime employer, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and... [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:28 am
Circuit Court of Appeals, which governs appeals in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee) have interpreted Title VII's anti-retaliation provisions to only apply to those directly affected by and filing a discrimination or sexual harassment charge. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
So counsel filed a Crawford motion rather than risking the client getting convicted of a more serious offense and receiving more time. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:22 pm
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held that even if Crawford was fired for answering the intestigator's questions, that was not protected participation in any official proceeding. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:11 pm
Hall, 07-1568). ** An appeal by the U.S. [read post]